Savage_Rob wrote on 12/31/69 at 16:00:10:Well, I've been surfing this site since July and have read several topics, that's true. I did not take particular note of which specific ranges of jets were mentioned nor by whom. I can, however, assure you the Dynojet kit I have does indeed have a 146 main included in it (along with several others starting with a 138, I believe). I used the 146 today. There was a stock Mikuni 145 in the carb to begin with and it did concern me that the largest in the kit was a 146 but from reading another post just today, it seems the Dynojet jets are different from the Minkuni jets. In any case, it seems to be running pretty well though I do intend to get a handful of the Mikuni mains to play with because I think it's still a bit lean. I also have a K&N direct replacement for the stock filter. While I was in it I replaced the needle with the new Dynojet version and replaced all of the stock screws with stainless hex-head versions to make it easier to get to next time.
Also, I was unaware that any baffling existed on the Raaske since everyone always refers to it as a straight pipe. I've never seen one in person. Your note that it does contain baffles make me wonder if the MAC may not then be very similar in function, but as a slip-on rather than a full pipe.
Oops. Maybe I missed the part that you had gotten a Dynojet kit. I thought that you were talking Mikuni jets. My mistake.
In form and function you might say the Raask and Mac are similar. Yes, it is a straight pipe but with a sound absorbing baffle tube in the last half. It is available with an additional removable baffle (that stays removed on mine).
The big difference is the ID of the pipe. Both the stock header and the Raask are double walled, as you know, but the difference is the ID of the inner wall at the exhaust port outlet. The Raask is 1/4" larger in ID throught the header and then the baffle tube is also the same ID at the outlet. So from this respect, the Raask is different and also freer flowing.