“All I’m doing is asking questions. When you walk out barefoot and you don’t step on any plane parts. . . .”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/after-911-woman-who-was-at-pentagon-r...Her office was about fifty feet from the hole.
That compressor fan is nowhere Near the size of those engine parts on a Jumbo jet.
Where is the 100 tons. Of airplane?
How does an aluminum tube break through several walls?
Yet, those engines didn't? That puny little compressor fan is just about right for a cruise missile.
Now, you're determined to fight to the death over the Pentagon.
Understand that All the conspiracy theorists have to do is demonstrate one lie.
I've posted links to interviews/statements by credible people. People who have flown these planes. Pilots with thousands of hours admit that even They couldn't maneuver that huge plane at those speeds, not to hit the Pentagon, not even the towers.
Those planes that hit the towers were being controlled electronically. And, if you look closely, underneath the fuselage there is a pod of some sort, just under the wing root. Not something that belongs on a passenger jet.
So, once again, let's just SAY a Jumbo Jet hit the Pentagon.
And, let's move on.
Pick one,
Seven
Either tower.
Someone mentioned a skyscraper that burned, very badly, but it stood.
How many times, as children, have we stacked things, and watched them fall Over? There is a Reason why professionals are called in to demolish buildings. If tossing gas in and lighting it up would bring one down, that is how it would be done. The structure didn't lean over, it fell down. And, in the case of 7, it accelerated at essentially free fall speed for about 100 feet.
Watch the video.. I posted a link. You can see the penthouse drop in the middle of the roof, then the roofline stays almost perfectly straight, as it starts down. It's a classic demolition. Experts from other countries even say so. It's hardly even burning, certainly not fully engulfed, and it's only got office equipment in it, except for a fuel storage tank on a lower floor.
It's not easily explained. Especially if experts, not government paid " experts ", are asked.
Taking a stand on this topic is hazardous for business owners.
Yet, some 1,500 architects and engineers have done just that.
Spend some time looking at the models and listen to how they explain it. They show the frame by frame, measuring the distance fallen, time taken, calculations, showing just how close to free fall it is.
Excerpt
We know that the falling section of Building 7 did not crush the lower section of the building because the top section of Building 7 fell at freefall. It didn't just fall at something close to freefall. It fell for about 2.5 seconds at a rate that was indistinguishable from freefall. If the falling section of the building had crushed the lower section, the lower section would have pushed back with an equal but opposite force. But that would have slowed the fall. Since the fall was not slowed in the slightest, we can conclude that the force of interaction was zero... in both directions.
http://www1.ae911truth.org/news-section/41-articles/872-freefall-and-building...Watch the video, that is
Observed Reality
Read the article
It explains what we saw without having to resort to magic.
Pages: 
