http://liliputing.com/2014/10/zotac-zbox-pico-pocket-sized-desktop-pc-review.... Zotac ZBOX pico pocket-sized desktop PC full review"It’s not a particularly powerful Windows PC. It has the same processor you’ll find in dirt cheap Windows tablets… and that’s led some folks to conclude that even at $200, this little desktop is overpriced. After all, you can pick up a Toshiba Encore Mini or Winbook TW800 for about half the price.
How did we get to this point? In order to fend off competition from upstart chip designer ARM, Intel is selling its low-power Atom processors at dirt cheap prices. Meanwhile Microsoft is literally giving away Windows licenses for free to makers of small, low-cost tablets, notebooks and other computers in an effort to compete with Google Android and other mobile operating systems.
That’s allowed device makers to start flooding the market with Windows tablets with Intel chips that are priced competitively with Android tablets featuring either ARM or Intel processors.
It remains to be seen whether these low prices are sustainable — we could see sticker prices go up once Microsoft and Intel have decided they’ve grabbed enough market share from their competitors. Or prices could stay low indefinitely… in which case we could see device makers start pulling out of the market due to ever-dropping profit margins (which is one of the reasons netbooks largely disappeared a few years ago).
Anyway, the point is that we now live in a world where folks call a tiny, fanless Windows desktop that’s small enough to slide into a pocket overpriced when it sells for $200." Brad Linder's Verdict"The Zotac ZBOX PI320 pico isn’t the cheapest computer on the market, it’s certainly not the most powerful, and depending on your definition of a desktop PC, it might not even be the smallest.
That said, it’s still a remarkable little device that won’t be the right choice for everyone… but which could certainly be a good choice for some users."My verdict ???? It was the first of its kind and Zontac was trying to make some egregious premium dollars off the idea of being "tiny" and of being first to the market.
As such, I totally agree with Brad Linder that the Zontac Pico unit is really overpriced by nearly 2x to its real value. A more correct valuation is reflected by this $49 bare bones Mele unit (built in China for the Chinese people) which will allow you to spec the unit with differing amounts of memory and SSD and this unit could allow you to come in with
twice as much unit for only 3/4 the price of the Zontac Pico unit.
However, the Intel processor itself is still a bit too minimal for real uses.
When 14nm rolls through next year the direct descendant of this unit will be the one to watch for "low end best value" PCs. (assuming that Intel and MS keep up all the Chinese freebie giveaways that is) 14nm is going to be 20% FASTER on the CPU and we are "promised" 3x the graphics performance of the standard Intel on-board graphics which will supposedly be built into all these 14nm Intel chipsets.
(Ha -- Intel speaks with confusing brown icky tongue on all that 14nm Sophia stuff)
This Mele unit is the only true price/value competition for the Chromeboxes that are out there on the market right now, but it is currently too slow for any gaming uses and boots much slower and still requires the constant Windows anti-virus and defrag, etc. etc.
But still, it is a LESS THAN $100 full function Windows PC with full I/O
(including LAN, HDMI, Composite jacks and a VGA port) Mele PCG03 Specifications:
SoC – Intel Atom Z3735D “Bay Trail” quad core processor @ 1.33 GHz (Burst freq: 1.83 GHz) with Intel HD graphics
System Memory – Optional 1 or 2 GB DDR3
Storage – Optional 16, 32, or 64 GB eMMC + micro SD slot
Video Output – HDMI 1.4, VGA and Composite (RCA),
Audio I/F – HDMI, Stereo RCA, optical S/PDIF, and MIC and earphone jack.
Connectivity – 10/100M Ethernet, 802.11 b/g/n Wi-Fi
USB – 2x USB 2.0 host
Power Supply – N/A
Now, here is the rub -- whatever chip performance gains you get in the 2015 Windows low end units you will also get in the Chromebox units
as they use the same processors.
Chrome is much smaller, runs quicker, requires less memory and naturally costs less than Windows machines ---- and these natural advantages will remain next year and the year after that UNLESS MICROSOFT DEPORKY'S WINDOWS AND GETS IT TO BE
LEAN AND FAST ENOUGH TO BE ACTUALLY PERFORMANCE COMPETITIVE WITH CHROMEBOOKS AND CHROMEBOXES.
So far we have not seen any real Win 10 changes as far as fat, porky and slow goes .....