Really? You didn't acknowledge, for whatever reason, that my elementary analogy claims both scenarios have drugs in the car. To clarify: Illegal drugs.
Trump didn't have drugs nor were his documents illegal...............
I also did not address this statement to You, or Serowbot, or any specific member or member's political ideology - for a reason.
Your choice...............
I agree with your assessment, also I see you state: "documents were turned over" Ok so you acknowledge the documents were turned over, and yes to an extremely friendly AG. Will you acknowledge that in the other situation the documents were not turned over?
He will summarize it better than me.
Or will you just claim I am being intentionally duplicitous instead?
Yes
Best regards,