T And T Garage wrote on 10/15/18 at 14:40:11:
I support the Second Amendment.
Ya have done a great job of convincing EVERYONE, that you don't !
But it's clear that 229 years later, there needs to be different considerations made.Exactly what part of:
"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." do you NOT understand ?
I understand every word mn. But you tell me - should we have any restrictions? Should we let a 12 year old carry a loaded double barrel shotgun to class? How about a 16 year old with hand grenades - cool?Apparently, you are ignorant of all the laws on the books, which, ALSO, affect all those others places, you blame, for Chicago’s problems.
You just can't be taught - not my fault.
AND, it is ultimately clear, you don’t understand, BANNING, guns from Honest Citizens, does NOT stop the dishonest gang banger, from getting/using a gun.
No, in fact, I understand that very well. Which is why I have NEVER said that guns should be banned. If you're accusing me of saying that, show me proof.Must be,
’those other State’s fault’, that a,
"Chicago-area woman arrested last year for her role in illegally selling guns to prohibited buyers, some with gang affiliations.” Certainly could not be any fault of the City. And, because it must be,
’those other State’s fault’, that is why,
“Straw purchaser with 4 felony gun charges will not get jail time”https://www.guns.com/2017/04/17/straw-purchaser-with-4-felony-gun-charges-wil...(OH, Where/how did she buy those guns ? With a IL issued FOID card ?)
Let’s see tt, walk into a bank, with your hand in your pocket, pointer finger pushing the fabric, show the teller, and say, ’this is a stick up’. Then a min later say, ’Never Mind’, and walk out. What do you think will happen ?
WTH does that have to do with anything we're talking about here?
Yet in 2010, 80,000 people were refused firearm purchase, and
(because of all the things, ‘you say’), which have been IN PLACE since 1993, only 44 were prosecuted.
(Rated, ‘Mostly True’ by the UL’s Favorite, fact checker. and it was, ‘mostly’, because the original report said 2012, not 2010)https://www.politifact.com/new-hampshire/statements/2013/mar/22/kelly-ayotte/...But wait, tt says MORE LAWS, restricting the Honest Citizen are needed.
Perhaps, the UL Progressive, Fairy Dust Sprinkling, Kum-By-You singing Snowflakes, should say. ‘Enforce what is on the books now’.
Do you really expect anyone to take you seriously? I realize you're trying to be "cute", but you make yourself look like an idiot.
How many ties do I have to say it - I'm saying that FEDERAL LAWS should be more strict.
What part of that do you not understand?Naa, Just cry about something you know nothing about, and ‘make more laws’, just as the, ‘gun grabbers’ say you should.
Pages: 
