The DOJ nowadays is no different than the mainstream media. They were afraid that what ultimately did happen would happen. They desperately want the truth to be this cop executed the gentle giant in cold blood.

There is no scientific experiment being conducted by your secret group that runs the world. We are unfortunately saddled with emasculated leaders.

Ok JOG, this one is for you.  I have no doubt their are extraordinarily powerful people and groups influencing if not making decisions.  Some people call them globalists, bilderbergs, bankers, I am partial to the term central planners.  I know you have done extensive research and I would like you to outline how you think this structure actually works.  If you are not interested; no problem, I think it would be an interesting topic worthy of its own thread.

If you doubt how totally emasculated the main stream media is and how afraid they are of challenging the liberal enforced mantra that the plight of black America is all the fault of "The Man", watch a rerun of Meet the Press this morning, listen to the pathetic comments of the Mayor of Atlanta, and note that neither of the supposed conservatives on the panel said a thing to dispute his stupidity.....

To open their mouth and challenge his comments would label them racist and they'll be drummed out of the "club".

Lets boil off the fat........

At times it seems problem are bigger than they are, but as Solomon remarked years ago, ain't nothing new under the sun.

Root problems are always the same, just different players and circumstance.

I will ask you this question, your answer will reveal if you're complicit or not.

Question:

Would you report to authorities an illegal act by a loved one or close acquaintance?

What is an illegal act, could be petty theft, drinking after consuming, fraud, tax cheat, drug use, poaching, over limit of game, possession of stolen property, you get the idea......

I think murder is obvious.

Well?  

A good "must read"...

http://www.fredoneverything.net/Ferguson.shtml

raydawg wrote on 08/24/14 at 10:59:44:


Yes. Stealing is stealing; the amount has nothing to do with whether or not it is wrong.
But you didn't say anything about right and wrong, you said " illegal." Not at all the same thing.

A couple of - I admit - trivial examples:

Where I live fourth -of July fireworks are illegal. So would I call the police on my neighbor if I saw his kids running around their yard with sparklers, or if he himself was lighting fireworks off on his own property? No I would not. He's breaking the law but as long as he is causing no harm he isn't doing anything wrong.

It is likewise illegal in my state to alter the factory exhaust system on a motorcycle. A huge percentage of the motorcycles on  the road, including my own, have non factory exhaust, or factory exhausts that have been altered in some fashion. Whenever I take mine for it's annual inspection should I call the cops on the guy who issues me the sticker? He's in fact breaking the law , just as I am.

Just because something has been deemed to be illegal by some government entity does not make it actually wrong or potentially, or actually, harmful or immoral. However most of the laws on the books deal with just such things.

Everything that Hitler did was legal. He and his cronies created the laws that made it so.
Legality and morality are not the same thing. I think most people are able to recognize the difference, which is why a lot of laws are pretty universally ignored until the powers that be decide to pick on someone, often for reasons that have nothing to do with the particular law those powers use to do the picking-on with.

raydawg wrote on 08/24/14 at 12:57:02:


No, the bottom line is whether or not ones actions cause harm, physical or economic, to someone else. That's what  makes something right or wrong. I think you are totally misunderstanding what I'm saying.

raydawg wrote on 08/24/14 at 14:20:50:


Sorry, now I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Or did you just misread what I typed - I said economic harm, not emotional.

If you mean do I think causing someone emotional harm constitutes doing a wrong or immoral act, then yeah, I suppose so. But that would be pretty hard to quantify. Physical or economic injury on the other hand is pretty obvious.

In the context of Ferguson though,justifying  rioting, arson and looting as a response to getting one's feeling hurt is a bit of a stretch. Most of the folks doing that had no discernible connection to either the policeman or the young man that was shot and killed.