DragBikeMike
Serious Thumper
Offline
SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 4230
Honolulu
|
Time to try it with the Mac header. The bigger header wanted less fuel. I achieved best performance with a #35 pilot jet, #142 main jet, and the needle clip in the fourth groove (rich).
Second Gear 4K to 7K: 3.00 seconds 0.03 seconds slower than stock header
Third Gear 4K to 6.5K: 5.49 seconds 0.25 seconds slower than stock header
Third Gear 4K to 7K: 7.80 seconds 0.15 seconds slower than stock header
Fifth Gear 3.5K to 5K: 5.43 seconds 0.41 seconds slower than stock header
Fifth Gear 3.5K to 5.5K: 8.42 seconds 0.67 seconds slower than stock header
It pulled 7500 rpm in third gear (50-rpm increase). Based on the acceleration times, it’s obvious that the larger header is a bit slower. Before the cam change, the larger header was faster. Why is that?
The short answer, valve overlap. Now that both valves are open at TDC, the inertia of the hot gas moving out the exhaust system can help evacuate the cylinder, and help pull in a fresh charge through the intake. A body in motion wants to stay in motion. A column of hot exhaust gas is a body too, it has mass.
Although the larger exhaust pipe is less restrictive, the hot exhaust gas moves at a lower velocity. Lower velocity, less inertia, less pull. At this stage of modification, the smaller stock header works a bit better than the larger Mac header.
If you review Part 4, you will see that when the stock cam was in play, the Mac header performed better than the stock header. That setup took advantage of the reduced restriction afforded by the larger pipe. The engine didn’t care much about the inertia of the exhaust gas because both valves were essentially closed during the overlap period. There was no overlap.
Don’t get the wrong idea here. Both setups are plenty fast. You would be hard pressed to tell the difference between the two pipes. They both feel great with the DR cam. When subjected to the scrutiny of the stopwatch, the stock pipe is just a bit faster. It would be great if I had a 1.5” and a 1.62” header pipe to test along with the stock 1.3” and Mac 1.79”. Hey, a header shootout. Who’s got pipes to share? Moving forward, it will be interesting to see what happens when we install the ported cylinder head with the 1.5” diameter exhaust port. Will the tables turn? Will the Mac pipe work better with the larger port? What will happen when we bump up the compression ratio? Which pipe will work better with 10.5:1 CR? Which will work better with more displacement? This project is a kick, I’m lovin it. Build it up piece by piece and test each piece as you go.
|