Hmm,the same FBI you leftists have championed are now saying
Nope
Not organized, not insurrection,
The VIDEO of guards fist bumping the scary government overthrowing crazies might be hard to explain in court,, kinda like them holding doors open, but, live in the delusion,, not my job to repair the minds of those who drank the koolaid.
The same people who chant
Follow the science
Tell me a man can be a woman if he wants to.

Phhhht..

The FBI have decided
Not insurrection

Has anyone been charged with insurrection?

Join the cool kids and call it an insurrection. Fine. Go ahead.

If there was an large, armed group who had realistic plans or actually did have arms, and took control with hostages and demands to stop the certification process and demand Trump be left in power, I’d agree with you, it was an insurrection.

But it wasn’t. It was a bunch of wound up, pissed off people tired of being $hit on who watched groups rip cities apart all summer, who got way out of control. That’s it. That’s all it was. It wasn’t an insurrection.

Yes, in today’s world, you need firearms to be considered an armed insurrection. Sure, 300 years ago, sharpened flagpoles were  a serious weapon. But a bunch of people trying to take over the capital with homemade blunt weapons, bear spray, slingshots is hardly a serious attack.

If Ashley Babbitt had a sharpen flag pole in her hand, it wouldn’t have done much good. She still would be dead.

 Yes, in today’s world, you need firearms to be considered an armed insurrection

 I again challenge anyone to find a legal way to get this done.  Not CNN/FOX as justification, but actual law.  I will pay for it under the terms I indicated before.

 This is an example of changing the definition of words to fit your narrative.  Armed is armed.  Not armed is armed except if combined with this other word.  It wasn't an armed insurrection because it wasn't an insurrection at all makes much more sense than saying it wasn't an armed insurrection because there were no guns.  If I commit an armed assault with a hockey stick and later it is proven it was self-defense nobody goes and says I was unarmed.  Why would they?


"Sure, 300 years ago, sharpened flagpoles were  a serious weapon. But a bunch of people trying to take over the capital with homemade blunt weapons, bear spray, slingshots is hardly a serious attack."

 I agree that the weapons are not ones capable of high injury/murder rate per minute.  I do however wonder how you can acknowledge "homemade blunt weapons, bear spray, slingshots" and also say they had no weapons at all.

 He had bear spray, and also had no bear spray.  That's your argument?


"If Ashley Babbitt had a sharpen flag pole in her hand, it wouldn’t have done much good. She still would be dead."

 Yeah anyone who has guns pointed at them and are told not to enter an area can expect to be shot.  By your logic if Ashley Babbitt had a sharpened flagpole in her hand - she had nothing in her hand.

It was or it wasn't can be argued forever with neither giving an inch as new information is unveiled.
But this is the mouse that roared.
A small contingent of right-wing conspiracy nuts are of one opinion, and the FBI, CIA, NSA, DOJ, and the majority of America and the world have a different opinion.

We don't give equal credence because we shouldn't.

This same nut fringe says vaccinations make you magnetic, and are used to track you.
Jews shot laser beams from satellites to start Cali wildfires.
Liberals are baby eating pedophiles.
Trump is really still President.
The election was a fraud.

Seriously?
Why?
Social media has found a way to coalesce the crazy.  
It happens that former President Trump is one of them.
That does not validate their opinions.