Serowbot wrote on 06/30/21 at 09:23:59:Web,... in some posts you deny Climate Change,.. in others you admit it but say it's natural.
If I assume you will agree that it's happening, what difference does it make whether it's natural or not?
If we admit that it's happening, shouldn't we try to reduce the effect?
It will displace millions of people, costing trillions of dollars. It will destroy farms. It will devastate ports and commerce. Insurance rates will soar. Lives will be lost by flood, fire, and storm.
Doesn't it seem socially and economically sound to fight it?
I don’t deny the climate changes. I just pointed out again the Great Lakes were formed by retreating glaciers as the temperature shifted a very short 15,000 years ago so clearly the climate changes.
I believe gases generated by human activity could and do impact the earths climate. VOCs from the wildfires on the West Coast are detected in airborne sampling on the East Coast so certainly gases released into the atmosphere could trap heat. They could also generate many other interactions that we don’t understand yet.
I just question why scientific debate is shut down on this topic unless the premise has been agreed to before hand and that premise is a predetermined temperature increase will occur due to CO2 despite the fact temperature predictions made for the previous 20 or 30 years have not been met.
Climate change is an industry in and of itself. As I said, people make fortunes, peoples careers or made, enormous amounts of money changes hands based upon the premise I stated above. And if you disagree with the premise or offer legitimate scientific evidence to suggest otherwise, you are labeled, as my Chicago friend just did, a denier because that’s easier than considering for a moment that maybe the reason why the temp predictions have been way off is because we don’t understand the dynamics like we thought we did and perhaps we should listen to these other ideas rather than force then into the dark or end their careers.
Climate change has not displaced millions, has not created massive immigration, is not the cause of more powerful hurricanes, tornadoes or not even the cause of a condo collapse in Florida. As I’ve challenged everyone on here before, give me evidence of one thing you’ve seen in your lifetime that’s different now than 25 years ago that you can directly tie to a temperature increase of a fraction of a degree.
Climate change is a convenient reason for all types of social engineering schemes which mostly come out of the left side of the political spectrum.
So yes I’m suspicious. Like Obama, Kerry, Biden and others, if I had the ability to buy a seafront house, I would because like them, I’m not seriously worried about the sea flooding inland.