Well since a lot of what's wrong today is still Obama's fault I see no reason to say nothing is Trump's fault 4 years from now.

 At least with a POTUS we can be sure nothing is our fault.

"There is a reason why the vote counts were greater than100% of registered voters."

 This again.  You obviously don't care if those numbers were taken not just from incorrect counties, but completely different states.  Different states.  Selective data as usual, look at these "facts", but ignore the parts that don't support my opinion.

 I posted the ones for CO, did you even bother to go through them and outline where the variance is?  Like real numbers using actual math?  If so I'd like to see how your numbers are different from mine.  There are discrepancies but not at the magnitude claimed. Or maybe you are just too trusting of the information you want to be true?  


 Again I am saying if people can run around blaming Obama for things today I see no reason for people to not blame Trump for things in 4 years.  Why wouldn't they?

 Trump did good things, but people who do not like Trump will selectively ignore them just like they selectively ignore bad things Obama did.

 Trump supporters will do the opposite and ignore bad things Trump did and complain about Obama who "never" did anything good.

 The truth is they both do bad and good things.  The variables are too high to possibly impact every American positively, or negatively on any decision.

 No

 Useable

 Evidence

 Since people can run around blaming Obama for things today I see no reason for people to not blame Trump for things in 4 years.

It's like you speak a different language  

Seems like nothing is accurate until you say it

Eegore wrote on 01/22/21 at 15:15:46:

 No.  It's not even close to being accurate.

So then G.M.A. the so widely watched, and so, "respected", news.
Is Lying ??????

Or is, GMA, "not even close to being accurate", perfectly OK with you ?

Eegore wrote on 01/23/21 at 21:48:05:

"... but historically you will blame some past forum member's behavior that I had nothing to do with, as the reason you won't provide information on anything I ask about.

Not to disappoint you, Just do as tt often said to do:
‘... don’t be so . . . lazy and look it it up yourself …”

"... I've already said many times I do not use mainstream entertainment news ..."

So, because, You, don’t watch gma, ‘news’,
It is perfectly logical for you to say “... because MnSpring says so”, when it was just repeating what gma said.
And because you, don’t watch gma, that means  what they say, does not influence the opinion of ¾’s (+/-)% of the population of the US.
OK, Got It !

Eegore wrote on 01/24/21 at 15:10:15:

"...  as you indicate "gma"  ..."
"... no reference as usual, so yeah it's you saying so ..."

Glad you went back and actually read that post, (or someone called you), and then you edited your post.  
Saw your post last night,
was going to ask that you have someone read my post to you.

Yet !

“...  As far as I am concerned GMA never said what you claim because I can not find any source and you will not provide it …”

So, you can’t see the date of the original post, then start by watching that program on that date ?
You want me to do the work of coping, editing, compiling, so you can have the tiny sound bite ?
(what was that tt often said)

Gee, looks like gma was caught in the truth !
Because that information, ‘news’, story, has the implication of a LIE, in the 24-7 ‘news’ stories that vaccines are NOW, in short supply. And the (hoarding) report has not been repeated over and over and over etc.

From what I recall, while sitting on the couch drinking coffee, it was Germany, UK, Canada and the US which had secured many more doses than the population. And the US had secured the most.

So you gonna do what tt often told people what to do ?
Or just complain,
because you believe that I make things up ?