DragBikeMike
Serious Thumper
Offline
SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 4411
Honolulu
|
Taking the pawl out will relieve some stress on the guide, but you lose control of the intake closing event. Limiting the back-travel with a stop in the tensioner mitigates the valve control issue, but not under all conditions. If you remove the pawl and don't install a stop to minimize the back travel, you end up with the plunger moving back & forth a whole bunch. If you are looking for performance, valve control is pretty important.
This photo gives you an idea of how much that plunger moves around when the pawl is completely removed. I removed the pawl and greased up the plunger, then rotated the engine through several times. Each time the intake cam lobe goes over the nose the valve springs drive all the slack out of the rear side of the chain. It causes the plunger to retract. The result is the intake valve closing way before it should. It also negates the deceleration ramp ground into the cam lobe because the valve is driving the cam rather than the cam holding back the valve.
|