eau de sauvage wrote on 04/04/20 at 17:07:43:

"...  Freedom is alway freedom from something...."

I would say, Freedom,
is NOT being restricted,
from something.

Be sure to include your preferred pronoun

Sir

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Remember, Regulated THEN could well have had a different implication. Hafta go to a Reall Old Blacks Law Dictionary. Notice how much Regulated and Regular have in common. There were many calibers of guns back then,, and each required the correct lead ball. Having a community of people,, who make up the militia, the able bodied citizens, with mostly common caliber weapons meant the community coulod store ammunition in quantity and getting the correct ammo to each member woulod be much easier.
The constitution is a document that Limits the Power and authority of the government.
There just isnt any way to be confused by
Shall Not Be Infringed.
No mention of target shooting or hunting. The second amendment is written to make it possible for the People to cast off tyrannical government. Period.

"Words like: Gay, Plunger, Artificial, Brave, and Many others.
Had completely different meanings 250 years ago then today.
So by the same thoughts, all writings that used those words,
need to be rewriten ?"

 Not to remove the power that gun control advocates are using.  Why argue semantics of unrelated things when it's very obvious that the term "Regulated Militia" is being misunderstood?  Changing "Gay" will not help you there so I'd say your question is not advancing your cause.  But keep asking it and see if it changes anyone's mind about gun control.



"Far better to simply educate, on the meaning of words.
(Oh, forgot, schools don’t teach that anymore, because the teachers don’t know)"

 So you are acknowledging that the education system is inaccurate, yet you want the education system to resolve this problem.  Keep up with that and see if it changes anyone's mind about gun control.


"Opening up the 2nd to a rewrite will mean
it will be word crafted to remove Freedom !"

 Not what I asked.  Lets re-look at the question in context:  What part of the following sentence promotes gun control?

"All legal US law abiding citizens can possess without restriction all forms of firearms, and as such no Government may influence, control, study, or alter the methods in which legal US law-abiding citizens can possess said firearms."


 It's like saying amending the Constitution to include women's voting rights will open it up to remove Freedom!  Some changes are positive.

 My point is the term "Regulated Militia" is a powerful and often used term within gun-control circles to alter the perception of the 2nd Amendment.  Complaining does not advance knowledge on this issue, presenting legal arguments, social media campaigns, public outreach and things of that nature do.  Handing out business cards about losing a customer will not change law, social movement does.  Look at how marijuana was legalized, it wasn't by complaining about how legal it should be.
 

"Who are, what political affirmation do the people have,
that want to rewrite the, or parts of, the Constitution ?"

 I don't know, I am open to any statistics you are willing to provide.

All legal US law abiding citizens can possess without restriction all forms of firearms, and as such no Government may influence, control, study, or alter the methods in which legal US law-abiding citizens can possess said firearms

That Sounds good.. and its a ood start, Keeping the boobs from rewriting the laws and not creating nitpicking laws to make criminals of good peaople is a problem, but your answer is a REALLY good start, IMO.