No, this thread is about yet another TDS inspired rant based on blind hatred and ignorance. Let’s face it, if this is what you’re basing your position on:  

But while the US pursues an america first policy, China, having shown how to contain the virus in a population 4 times the size of the US, is using the situation which is likely to go on for a year, to gradually replace the US as an influential player on the world stage.

...you’re not to be taken seriously.

eau de sauvage wrote on 04/03/20 at 08:50:27:




Yes I agree, and that was the intent (or atleast the intent after the fact). That's why the cover up, the feeding bodies into the factories - and soft and hard power is expanding - exactly what the doctor ordered to produce global domination.

Cool.
Srinath.

You “see” the blue sky because China told you it’s blue but evidence points to the likelihood it’s not. You see blue because with Trump, all you see is red.

"Explain why not.

Why, do Firearm haters/grabbers/banners/etc people,
who receive their knowledge from other, Firearm haters/grabbers/banners/etc.
Who do, what they are told to do by, Firearm haters/grabbers/banners/etc.
Who obtain their information from Firearm haters/grabbers/banners/etc media sources.
Are any different, (in your opinion), than people that do not work in a virus containment field,
and obtain their information from  independent sources ?"

 Its not like that because I was referring to virology and epidemiology and not firearms.  But as I said already, I do think people who use firearms have more knowledge of them than people who do not.



"What is a person, who answers a question not asked, or makes a statement not relevant called ?"

 They are called a person who has answered an unasked question, or a person who made an irrelevant statement.



"Do I have more knowledge of Firearms then you, Bot, tt, eds, and others that comment negatively about firearms ?
Don’t know. (Guessing I do). I would have to interview you, see how you handle one, and see you shoot to know for sure.
Do you have more knowledge about virus containment than I ? (Guessing you do)"

 I've run live-fire and simulation drills for companies and governments all over the world (thus my travels in S America, Syria, Iraq etc.), I have referenced this in the past.  We allow, with certain restrictions, for civilians to take part, I've offered this in the past.  I extend this invitation to you.  This will give you the opportunity to assess my skill set with firearms.

 So let me ask this again:  When have I ever commented "negatively" about firearms?  My assessment is disagreeing with the red car logic is not negative to firearms as I still feel firearms should be owned by legal US citizens, I just think the red car logic is poor.  The logic, not the gun.

 So when have I actually commented "negatively" about gun ownership for legal, law abiding US citizens?




"So when, many, Many, MANY others, say banning a model of firearm will not stop a crime, or putting up a sign will not stop violence, or creating laws that mirror laws that are on the books that are being ignored. And that More Guns equal Less Crime.
It is NOT to be believed ???"

 I never said that.  I have always said banning specific gun types will not lead to less firearm crime, please reference where I have said otherwise.  I have always said signage will not alter criminal intent, please reference where I have said otherwise.  I have always said legal restructuring using current laws as basis and to use basis as exclusionary guidelines for new law, please reference where I have said otherwise.



"Yet when you, say a virus was not, ‘created’, or ‘unleashed’, everybody is to totally, without question, believe it ?
And bow, tug at their forelocks, and say: ‘yes sir - yes sir’."

 No, I never said that, you did.  I said that I will prioritize the information provided by people with decades of experience working in a field that present tangible evidence over people who are sitting at home, who never seen a virus in real life, that claim they know more than people doing the work in the real world because they looked up some articles on the internet.



"Really ?"

 No.  Almost everything you claimed I said is false.  Please reference where I have made the statements you are claiming I did.

eau de sauvage wrote on 04/03/20 at 18:12:24:

"... anyone who doesn't parrot Trump, is a libtard...."

And everyone that loves FREEDOM is a ... ?

eau de sauvage wrote on 04/04/20 at 00:29:09:



I don't know who this "everybody" you are referring to here but I have never said it was a created or a bio weapon or anything.
I am saying this - If the labs had it, and its the most likely scenario, they could have just been studying it, then it got disposed off by feeding it to other animals or just sold as bat meat in the market next door. That would simply be negligence, profiteering, saving $$$ whatever.

If lab didn't have it, and the sellers @ the market found a bat cave and picked them up, that's a case of poverty in the middle of  "booming" economy - which is again due to the fact that china is a slave camp.

Your only leg to stand on is if you can prove it did not come from china. This is a china virus. They pay people nothing so they eat bat meat sold unhyigenically. Or they have labs save $ or make a lil extra by selling off the dead animals after experiments.

The best 2 cases. Again - unless these things come out of another country these are the best 2 options for corona and SARS. We don't blame China for Ebola, but we blame them for this fair and square. These above 2 options are the best, it gets worse from there.

Cool.
Srinath.

@Mn And everyone that loves FREEDOM is a ... ?

A human being. Freedom is alway freedom from something. In the case of the human being they want freedom from the feeling that they lack. Freedom from being  a wanting person.

 Would the ability to publicly declare opposite gender be considered a freedom?