Eegore
Serious Thumper
Offline
SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 8007
|
"It is, according to you, the only correct statement to make ?"
No.
"Did you forget to say, what the complete statement said ? "...we don't need a physical wall. We have a natural barrier..." "
No. I linked the article in an attempt to provide a complete statement. My intention is to say that officials in Laredo do not think they need a physical wall in their geographical location. A physical man made wall specifically.
"And when the POTUS, and other people say, People that, are there, and do, that, as their job. It is, according to you, NOT correct ?"
I don't know what you are asking.
"And anyone that makes a statement that supports a wall, is a ‘Desk Jockey’ Only ?" No. To clarify: Many people of various professions that agree with the proposal that only a large physical barrier constructed along the entirety of the border will create a reduction in illegal border crossings are no matter what their profession may be, incorrect and typically, typically meaning in most but not all cases, choosing a strategy that most, most meaning the majority but not every, Border Control employees, engineers, DHS staff and military personnel with a specialty in access control indicate is not fiscally responsible, efficient or most effective. Many of these conclusions coming from data and alternate strategies effectively utilized by the US Navy in the region.
Many, not all of the people I actively discuss this with have zero idea of what goes on at the border, have never worked in security or access control. Many in this case represents the majority but not all of the people I actively have border control discussions with.
I support a wall, I do not support a large physical full length barrier based off the immense cost of doing that when there's cheaper and better methods that can be used in very specific geographical locations.
|