T And T Garage wrote on 11/16/18 at 08:12:51:


How is that hampering government oversight?

never said it hampered government oversight.  I stated that studies like the ones I posted can no longer be done because they shut out the public.

Obama didn't veto that?
Gee, why not?

T And T Garage wrote on 11/16/18 at 09:42:51:

 I stated that studies like the ones I posted can no longer be done because they shut out the public.

To stop CRAP like this.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/gun-map/
(From the UL’s  Favorite UL sight)

And this:
The editor of the New York newspaper that created a furor by publishing the names and addresses of gun-permit owners suddenly is out of a job.
According to the Rockland Times, a competitor to the Gannett-owned Rockland County Journal News, editor Caryn McBride is among the casualties of a recent purge at the Journal News.

The report said 17 journalists were among a total of 26 staff members at the Journal News who were let go.

McBride and other executives then decided to hire armed guards to protect their property, the Times reported, “causing an uproar due to the perceived hypocrisy of the avowed anti-gun editors hiring gun-toting men.”
Two months ago, the White Plains-based newspaper admitted that the information it published was badly outdated. The paper acknowledged many people had a dot on their house, indicating there was a gun permit at that address, even though they didn’t own a gun.

The responses to the publication included the publication of a map showing “Where are the Journal News employees in your neighborhood?” The Times said a Clarkstown police report confirmed that armed security guards were hired for the Journal News.

The Times also reported that shortly after the publication of the map, authorities said burglars entered the home of one of the gun owners identified by the newspaper, and a gun safe that was on the premises was damaged in a robbery attempt.

https://www.wnd.com/2013/08/bang-editor-fired-after-publishing-gun-owner-map/

And this  UL, Progressive, Panty in a bunch, Fairy Dust Sprinkling Snowflake.
"Below is a 446-page list of every licensed gun owner in New York City. I obtained it from the NYPD two-and-a-half years ago via a Freedom of Information Law request.”
“…could see the name and address of each pistol or revolver permit holder. Accompanying text states that inclusion does not necessarily mean that an individual owns a weapon, but had obtained a license…”

Again the the he/she called tt, that cannot read or comprehend.
Read this again, (or have someone read it to you)
These names do not necessarily mean that an individual owns a gun, but just had obtained a license.
Today, those are, state  records, which you can get, if you have a ’taint’ buddy that gives them to you.

And now all the Panty in a bunch people will yell,
“They Have The ‘Right’ to know”
Perfect examples of,  I can, You can’t.
(What,,,, the UL, Panty in a bunch crowd,
Forgot, about MY  ‘rights’)
HAY  tt, YOU own a gun,
(at least you have said so many times, or where you Lying again)
So, post your name, address, age, gender, etc.etc.etc !
No Problem, Right !
Or is this just another,
YOU can I  can’t
LOLOLOLOLOLOL

So for all the UL, Progressive, Panty in a bunch, Fairy Dust Sprinkling Snowflakes.
The ’tracking’ of firearms, by LEO/etc. is Still the same as it was in 1968.
What has changed is,
the UL, Progressive, Panty in a bunch, Fairy Dust Sprinkling Snowflakes,
are NOT allowed to harass law abiding Citizens !


Another example of the,
UL, Progressive, Panty in a bunch, Fairy Dust Sprinkling Snowflakes,
'thinking'. they will make something better.
When in fact they SHUT OUT scientific study of a subject.
Because, they are, (supposedly), 'thinking',
about how to make things better.

It's the same as a Condo community.
Where NO BBQ's (open fires) are allowed within 25 feet of a building, and only in the back yard area.
Sounds Good, however the UL, Progressive, Panty in a bunch, Fairy Dust Sprinkling Snowflakes, could not see, from the building to the property line, in the back, was 24 feet.

And that is basically what the, 'taints' have been doing to this Country, and want to do more.

T And T Garage wrote on 11/16/18 at 12:50:36:

Keep up the great work there little fella!

Thanks, I will.

You don’t know, what I weigh, or how tall I am.
So when you call me, ‘little fella’, it don’t  mater.
You just don’t know.

I have stated my age, many times.
And reading my posts, one could conclude/affirm my age by the content/references/etc in my posts.  
The same as gender.
So keep saying, ‘little fellow’, it, don’t bother me at all.
Because, you simply, Don’t Know !

Yet I see, me, calling you, ‘he/she’
greatly bothers you.

I know you have said your gender is male,
but by your posts/reactions/comments,
and by your constantly Lying in your posts.
(Lying, is eliminating Facts or manipulating Facts, on Purpose)
I simply don’t know what your gender is.
So I will continue calling you, ‘he/she’.

As for, Troll,
Ray Charles could have, seen, that !

T And T Garage wrote on 11/16/18 at 14:09:25:

Thanks for making yet another Friday a good one for me!

Oh, so ya missed this.
Well here ya go I will re-post it for Ya.
As for, Troll,
Ray Charles could have, seen, that !

Now, your turn, you can have the last word.

Gee, I wonder who took down my post of pee wee the first time?

Will it happen again?

Let's see....

verslagen1 wrote on 11/16/18 at 14:37:15:



I do have an answer - my sincerest apologies vers - your comment didn't catch my attention.  Talk to mn about that - maybe put some all caps or bold type up...lol

I'm not talking about anything that granular.  Statistic firms conduct research on cars all the time.  They don't get detailed sales numbers of actual driver's information.

Thanks to the Tiahrt Amendment, the gun industry is now shielded from the public via the ATF from disclosing their sales.  This prevents any ral statistics from being gathered for academic purposes or litigation.

It's a smokescreen brought to you by the nra.

The US has more guns per-capita than any other country on the Planet.  I guess it's silly to think that we should maybe have the toughest oversight...

verslagen1 wrote on 11/16/18 at 15:08:48:


No.  

Ask yourself this vers - How was it "so bad" prior to the Tiahrt Amendment?  The only reason for it is to keep the public eye out.  Again, thanks to the nra.