https://www.techspot.com/news/75009-intel-28-core-fantasy-vs-amd-32-core.htmlI did mention the outraged and angry foaming at the mouth PC press review people about Intel's little "liar liar pants on fire" presentation?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTTPSuH24b8 its a YouTube, click on it
https://appuals.com/intel-28-core-cpu-pr-stunt/Forbes finally got Intel personnel to attempt to explain what they did (and why) --- what becomes clear is that Intel just can't keep from compounding their lies with MORE LIES that are even less likely than the ones before.
You say the Intel presenters got confused which show they were at ??? They put together the presentation slides and the see me case showing all the super duper gaming type decorative items and then ran the output video and keyboard connections to the concealed ugly rackspace board which was hooked up to the supercooler? They did this saying the special processor and ugly motherboard and the refrigerant cooler and the super power supply hardware was all supposedly intended for an upcoming rackspace overclocking demonstration ???
yeah, sure --- rackspace people don't ever over clock their motherboards, ever.https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonevangelho/2018/06/08/intel-explains-why-it-...New knowledge ....... The supercooler was in a soundproof enclosure with air flow sonic baffles located underneath the curtained table because it was WAY TOO NOISY --- hey how about you didn't want people at the show to be able to see neither the big ugly motherboard mounting the special sorted chipset, NOR the refrigerant super cooler set up NOR the giant power supply unit that your dirty little trick depended upon.
HOW BIG was that power supply? 1,300 watts total ability, supplied over 1,000 watts during the demo.
HOW COLD was the refrigeration cooling system? -40 degrees FNext item, the sheer amount of effort that had to be spent sorting and "binning' just to find a single chipset that could overclock a single 2.4 ghz core up to over 5 ghz (no matter what power supply and what cooling system was used).
Multiply this amount of effort now, multiply it enough to find one, just one chipset and socket set that could handle this sort of action on
ALL 28 CORES AT THE SAME TIME ...... the amount of effort spent in "binning" just to find these items was fairly astronomical all by itself according to the Tom's Hardware people.
Next, the service life of that special binned chipset would likely be measured in 10's of hours, not in 100 thousands of hours. Overclocking at those voltages and frequencies (at over 200% performance increase) is well past what even crazy enthusiasts would attempt to do for long.
How many times has Intel done completely fraudulent tricks like this, but because they were Intel and they were trusted, they got clean away with this sort of bullshite? Do they discover these special chipsets early on and carefully keep them so they can use them during demos?
How many times has the system you can see up on the table, it has NOT been the one driving the screen and the input devices, but instead a carefully sorted and binned "special refrigerant cooled rig" in an acoustical box under the table was what was actually hooked up and running the benchmark test?
Sorry boys, all that naive trust from years past is all gone now.
With Intel, what you see is NOT what you get.