Savage_Rob wrote on 12/31/69 at 16:00:09:Okay, this is slightly tangential to this thread but I'll ask anyway. What are the possible the downsides to removing the belt guard? Passengers getting pant cuffs caught and being dragged into the sprocket? Water and crud getting slung at the rider? These are just guesses as to why the bike has the guard in the first place. I ask because I don't really like the look of the guard at its present angle after I put on my new Progressive shocks and am considering simply removing it. I know a number of folks have removed theirs. Have any of you noticed any downsides or potential problems?
Okay....first off, as a genuine mechanical technician, I dislike the idea of removing something to get rid of a noise....to me that's like removing the engine to get rid of the backfire. AND in this case, if removing the belt guard eliminated the chirp, then the problem was either in the mounting of the guard or the front pulley cover. Either one shouldn't "chirp" if correctly installed.
As for the possible issues relating to an exposed belt that travels on open spinning pulleys....I don't see a problem as long as the rider keeps his feet on the pegs. I still have the front pulley cover installed and I threw away my "elephant" bell bottoms a few decades ago. Not a problem, Rob 8)
Oh yeah, don't forget that I fashioned a rear fender mud flap (barely visible) that keeps dirt from bouncing off the swingarm and getting into the belt.