"Truth- he died in the evening of the next day from a stroke which may or may not have had anything to do with the day before. Remember, two protestors died that day from natural causes. Your paper and probably you also said and perhaps you still say the officer was murdered."

 This is why people should not let "the news" give them all of their information if they want to proclaim truth to others.

 
"So keep posting articles that in six months will be proven false and a lie but the damage will already be done."

 You mean misinformation?  I hardly think Democratic leaning "news" is more involved in this than any other group, including Republican.  They may be better at doing it in a way that develops change, at this time, but they are far from being a majority culprit.
 
 The problem, to me, is that an entire generation of people were not exposed to this type of information pooling and didn't really get a fair shake at deciphering false information in modern media.

I hardly think Democratic leaning "news" is more involved in this than any other group, including Republican.  They may be better at doing it in a way that develops change, at this time, but they are far from being a majority culprit.

Wrong.

Quote:

Can't
Because he KNOWS full well;
Quote:


Is totally and absolutely WRONG.

(Well, except if one believes the political view of a couple 'wanna-be' comedians)

Game. Set. Match. To Eegore

"No reasonable person would believe"...

This phrase has been used as a defense in court by Sydney Powell, Hannity, Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, and probably others I can't recall.
Fox has argued that they are not liable to be factual because they are entertainment not news.

Tell me again how mainstream media lies more.
Tell me where they have used this defense.

A "No reasonable person would believe what I say" defense is calling their viewers ignorant at the least.

But since you like to bring up lawsuits, Sarah Palin‘s lawsuit against the New York Times last I heard is still set for trial. As you remember (because you repeated the lie yourself)  the New York Times linked Gabby Giffords shooting to Sarah Palin‘s political ad. The difference between that and tucker Carlson situation is the New York Times did it with malice. Meaning they lied with malice ito damage Palin as much as possible because they hate her.

And we could go on and on with the liberal lies about Russia gate and all the other Trump lies they made up. About the Covington high school kids. By the way, that kid is rich and getting richer because he keeps suing liberal news organizations that lied about him. I’d love to be his lawyer.

So you probably don’t want to go there. Just saying.

Seriously? The current president said he decided to run for office when he heard Trump say neo-Nazis are find people. That’s what he said. The problem is of course Trump never said that. So either Biden is too stupid to understand spoken word (which is a distinct possibility ) he flat out lied that’s when he decided to run, or he had no idea what Trump said that but someone told him to give a reason why he ran and that lie had been spread so completely by leftist media, that it was accepted as truth even though there’s clear video and audio tape of the opposite.

Face it, the left wins the lying game by 10 runs. Ever play softball when there’s a mercy rule? One team gets ahead by 10 they called the game because there’s no chance for the other team to catch up. That’s how we are today. We may eek out or run or two here and there but you’re so far ahead in the lying department we have no hope of breaking even much less winning.

As far as believing facts, you guys live in the world of denial of science.

But I see you didn’t answer, if white supremacist are the biggest threat to society today why are we not seeing regular attacks? Why are the hundred or so killed in St. Louis this year not killed by white supremacist? Look at Chicago look at LA look at New York pick your favorite major city and tell us how many people were killed by proud boys? Go ahead, I’ll wait.

T And T Garage wrote on 06/02/21 at 12:34:54:


Yet, once inside with little police presence, these organized terrorist took selfies, laughed, peed on Pelosi’s desk....   No one had guns, no one was prepared to murder, no one was prepared for anything. 20 could have gathered and hunted down a few Democrats but they didn’t. After the rush of what they did died down, it was over. Calling this an insurrection is ridiculous. Holding them without bail is how 3rd world nations treat political prisoners which is what they’ve become.

And now? The ones still in jail, these most dangerous threats to the homeland, are pleading guilty to essentially hyped-up trespassing charges. Yep, sounds pretty dangerous to me.