Not everyone is going to sue over PV videos, lack of lawsuits is not a strong assessment of accuracy.  I've been watching PV's and O'Keefe's footage and audio change for over a decade.  

 When you watch the short NPR video PV states that an Islamic group website says:

"the organization sought to spread the acceptance of sharia across the world."

 They then show Ron Schiller laughing and saying "Really, that's what they said?".

 That response was to a different event.  Why did it have to be edited that way?  We know why, but choose to justify it because Shiller is a dirt bag.  He wasn't reacting to that statement but the video leads us to believe he was.  That's out of context.

 After the Palestinian radio comment they cut out the "There is such a big firewall between funding and reporting.  Reporters will not be swayed in any way, shape or form." part of his response.  I think the immediate response holds more bearing to the conversation than choosing a response later and then editing it so it plays as if they were in sequence.

 Answers to questions were out of sequence.  To me that's altering the context.

 So, to me, just because I don't care for Schiller or NPR doesn't mean I am going to ignore that the responses shown are not the immediate responses to the questions or statements given.