"The FIRST thing that would come to mind,
is can I grab my gun, and shoot, before they shoot me ?"

 No.  Multiple armed assailants in arm's reach with guns will always beat one person unarmed trying to grab a gun and shoot two.


'Red Laws',  will be VERY poorly written, written by 'Gun Grabbers', enforced by Gun Grabbers, or Testosterone bulging people.
And will have no safety control's or verification methods.


 This is the problem.  You can write those laws too, but you have to go out and do it.  You have to go engage your legal system and enact change, or fund those that can.  The NRA will not be enough anymore.  And those arguments for change have to be accurate, or people will point out the inaccuracies you try to defend through semantics while the opposing more accurate information becomes law.

 I've done it in my state.  I've done it for national policy on medical centers.  I didn't get it done with my @ss on the couch complaining.

Boom, logic!

And yet
You continue to believe what has been proven false.

Boom,
Logic.

I'm wrong once
You're never right.
Piss off

Look at you..
You can't EXPLAIN why you believe.
It's unsupportable.
So you are trying to make it all about me.
Love to watch you squirm.. - 47 thousand posts, and you basically steal my quip - you're welcome...lol

The OP is about the "red flag" fear.  I wonder jog, have you ever stayed on topic in a thread... like ever??

You're talking about Global Climate Change - why not just keep pounding your sand there?  Why do you have to muck up other posts?

Go ahead
Explain why everyone should be all concerned about the coming end, again.