WebsterMark wrote on 10/07/18 at 07:42:09:


I think you meant "being"... at any rate, it's so convenient for you to paint all lefties with one large brush... I find that amazing.  Hey, maybe I should start saying that since there's a nazi running in IL on the republican ticket, then all republicans are nazis - it's the same thing all you cons on here do day after day.

But as to those accusations - given brett's lack of control, I wouldn't put it past him.  How many times do I have to say - Character matters... Bigly.

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 10/07/18 at 10:52:08:


Unless you're a woman, Muslim, gay, Hispanic, under 30, poor, sick, or have a child with a pre-existing condition...

'  Well insurance carriers can deny coverage based off of pre-existing coverage now, so that should cover the pre-existing coverage portion.

" All those are better off today than 2 years ago"

 Can you clarify regarding how people that would receive complete healthcare coverage if they paid the premiums 2 years ago are now paying the same premiums for healthcare issues that can be denied?

@JoG,

I don't need to read your post or the link, the title "Yep, trust wimmenz", is just a flag to display your spiteful misogyny, why so bitter towards women, obviously you've had to have had a sad life to feel you have to treat them as an enemy. Sort of firms up your racist credentials too, misogyny and racism go hand in hand.

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 10/15/18 at 02:58:47:

Noo,
Lying women,
Yes, you definitely need to read it.

Well Trump lies all the time, so that that mean all men are liars. I don't need to read it because obviously it's going to be some poor example that some women did, which is fine but then you brand whatever it is they did to ALL wimmen in your thread title and that automatically is instantly a misogynistic flag. Can't you see that, it's like branding all white people because of Charlotteville.

Eegore wrote on 10/15/18 at 15:35:58:



Oh thank you so very much for that wonderfully fair clarification. Nothing like excusing women haters. It's perfectly in keeping with his other racist misogynistic posts which parrot trump who of course is not a man nor a liar. I'm certain now eegore that you're trolling me, in your own sneaky way. But that's OK.

"Oh thank you so very much for that wonderfully fair clarification. Nothing like excusing women haters. It's perfectly in keeping with his other racist misogynistic posts which parrot trump who of course is not a man nor a liar. I'm certain now eegore that you're trolling me, in your own sneaky way. But that's OK. "

 Why would you think that I am excusing anything?  I am clarifying my personal assessment of this threads topic and verbiage.  In this thread I posted:

" I find it hard to believe we are to make many direct comparisons of events that are 7 decades apart.  I also find it hard to think anyone will take the post seriously when you can't even put a respectful title.

Is the presentation here to take two events in 70 years and use that as a parameter to create a general distrust in women?  Is this a suggestion that "wimmenz" are typically not sexually assaulted and in most cases it is made up?

The thousands of SANE kit DNA logs are false maybe?"

 Later in the thread JoG clarified that he did not mean all women but only lying women that in the course of lying have damaged men.

 Upon re-examination I realized that my original assessment of him meaning all women was due to the  "Z" in his selected term of "Wimmenz"

 This is my true belief based off of my observations and clarifications contained within this thread.  "Trolling" is essentially useless to me as I am not interested in anyone's emotional state here.