Eegore wrote on 07/12/18 at 20:30:43:
"...I'm not sure if Twitters description of their platform is correct..."
That's why I asked people that were ON twitter, and used it, and know what can, and can not be, done.
Any of the companies, 'social media'. They change the, 'rules' constantly.
- - - -
So if Buchwald said that blocking a twitter account, violates the First Amendment. Because it does not allow a person to express political views.
If up held.
Does that mean that in 100’s of Universities, 1,000 of classes, when a professor ‘punishes’ in some way or another,
a student, because that student/s, political view is different then that of the professors.
That ‘opinion’, will be upheld ?
Gee, why are their not a bunch of, ‘discussions’, considering a student kicked out of class, or campus, or out of a, ’safe space’, for stating a different political POV ?
Starting 40+ days ago ?
OH, ’Schools out for summer’.
Wonder if that could, (if upheld) fall over in the private sector.
Like in a case, where a employed person, could carry a firearm, while they were employed, to protect themselves in a dangerous situation, and protect themselves, in coming to or, going home from work.
And now they can’t.
It is Clearly a Political Opinion, of the company, that denied them, the right to defend their life, (while at the work place, that when they agreed to work their, by the rules that were in place when they were hired), with a firearm, stun gun, knife.
A new employee, sure, those are now the new rules, so work their by accepting the rules, or don’t.
But all the people that DO, work their, are suddenly told,
Your Political Opinion does not matter,
therefore, you conform to my, political opinion,
or you will quit.
Wonder how: ‘Viewpoint Discrimination is a violation of the 1st Amendment.”
When a company, forces, the employed it currently has, to a different political viewpoint, under threat of being fired, if they don’t.Would be viewed ?