Well, all you folks that earn over $5 million a year will be happy... as well as your rich families that leave you over $4 million in inheritance.

But to the rest of us, well... this won't be good.  And to the poor - I apologize in advance, 'cause you're all screwed...

http://www.yahoo.com/news/house-gop-moves-pass-budget-071424465.html

raydawg wrote on 10/26/17 at 09:03:17:


BFD....

First off, this post is about the tax cut.

Second, this payment would not have come out of the US budget (you can't be that dumb).

And thrid... well, read on....

Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on Wednesday disputed President Donald Trump's characterization of the now-infamous dossier of allegations about the President and Russia.

When asked on CNN's "Erin Burnett OutFront" about Trump calling the document a "fake" dossier, Clapper responded, "I don't think that is an accurate characterization for the entirety of the dossier."

He added: "The key thing is, doesn't matter who paid for it. It's what the dossier said and the extent to which it was corroborated or not."



So, there's that.

raydawg wrote on 10/26/17 at 09:23:33:


Who's they?  Washington?  Wrong again - the clinton campaign and the DNC would have paid for it.  Oh, but that still not proved out yet.  But Washington had nothing to do with it (which is what you first inferred).

And again - "The key thing is, doesn't matter who paid for it. It's what the dossier said and the extent to which it was corroborated or not."

Please ray, try to stay on topic of the original post, hmm?

T And T Garage wrote on 10/26/17 at 09:39:05:


STOP IT...... oh my gawd, you are hilarious, but please stop it, oh my gawd, stop, I need to catch my breath

She used campaign donations and didn't report it.
She's a criminal.
Suck it up, buttercup.
That's what she is.

TT you're hilarious.
Gutless good grief GUTLESS..
but funny..

You are absolutely right Bot, except they presented this as a factual investigation done by an entitiy that had no dog in the fight, which was the basis of the new investigation......

Why not be open and honest in the beginning then?

Don't answer, again.

Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on Wednesday disputed President Donald Trump's characterization of the now-infamous dossier of allegations about the President and Russia.

When asked on CNN's "Erin Burnett OutFront" about Trump calling the document a "fake" dossier, Clapper responded, "I don't think that is an accurate characterization for the entirety of the dossier."

He added: "The key thing is, doesn't matter who paid for it. It's what the dossier said and the extent to which it was corroborated or not."
--------------------
Well Director Clapper, you were the Dir of Natl Intelligence, you had this for a year and you couldn't corroborate anything?

As Director. "it doesn't matter who paid for it?" Really?

"...the entirety of the document...." Yea? Which part is accurate? The spelling of Trump's name? Other than that, apparently nothing else.

Hilary will now dodge real reporters even more so than normal. She's F'd. All The Clinton Foundation's dark secrets and crimes are going to slowly bubble upwards. No one is going to fall on their swords for them any longer.