With the event of Wikileaks's and Hillary's resistance to release her ties to Wall Street, banking, big industries, it to me seems obvious she grasp the reality of where the players reside.
Yep, the very folk who pollute for a profit, kick the old folk from their home so they can flip the properties for profit, banks that gouge the poor with interest rates in par with the mafia, etc.
In other words, the very folk who the left says the republicans smooze with and protect.
So, my question to you right brainers, is, why do you think Hillary is not going to play the same game once she gets her wish of being the first chick to be prez?
Yes, I get the campaigning stuff, heck, B1 said no new taxes to get elected....
So, why do you think she'll bail on the wealthy?

Serowbot wrote on 10/23/16 at 09:02:37:


And what gives you that idea?
Because she says so?
I am not being flippant.
I would love to see your reasoning extended beyond hope.
But you have the propensity to abandon dialogue when it gets uncomfortable for you, it seems.

These are the rich folks the left has played class welfare on.
These are the folks the right got associated with as being selfish, uncaring, and removed from everyone's welfare.

So how will all of this change?

Another story: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/23/business/rich-vote-republican-not-this-elec...

Serowbot wrote on 10/23/16 at 10:12:25:


Then why do you visit this forum?

Serowbot wrote on 10/23/16 at 10:19:49:


you still appear evasive on the matter.
I cite reasons why I believe she won't.
I have referred how she and Bill triangulated his administration once Newt came in after they lost the house in the first midterm, because the left, demanding a one-sided administration policies....
Remember, don't ask, don't tell, etc?

What I believe is different is, she is coming in on the heels of 8 years of Obama, which she can't blame if problems exist, etc...

And she really is a wall street type of politician, Liz Warren is right about her on that.

You base your argument on campaigning, which, if true, what happened to Obama's hope and change?

Please don't stoop to blaming the right, that is part of the system to, ya know  

Again, I wonder why you come to this forum, to spew and leave, golly, I thought you said democrats were more highly educated than republicans, you'd think they could persuade minds if they have the ability, knowledge, etc...
I forgot, have you shared with us your education before?
You have a Masters, in ?
Doctorate?
From where?

I am pond scum, school of hard knocks  

Quote:


Unless of course they can write them off by making a large charitable donation to the Clinton Foundation.

Here in lies the rub.
You can't change a leopard's spots.

There is no accountability. Look at someone like Vermin Supreme. He promises everyone a pony. Link here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4d_FvgQ1csE

Hillary can promise you the world but there's nothing saying she has to deliver. Supposition, I suppose. Want a real life example?

Barack Obama. Promised the world. Barely delivered.


--Steve