Votes shmotes... if it weren't for the electoral college, no Republican would ever win the WH

and the TX electoral votes in the Red bucket.

You sure about that? There have been local Texas Democratic officials openly bragging that they will turn Texas blue using immigration. Of course they say immigration and leave out the illegal immigration.

And with a continued push to allow voting without identification, how would you possibly know if an election was stolen? Remember, if you total the votes in three states, it would’ve taken only a swing of 20,000 votes to change the 2020 election outcome. Only 20,000. Every day there’s massive fraud and deceit going on in the country whether it’s minor theft (my darn helmet got stolen off my bike this weekend), or widespread theft of millions of dollars in corporate dealings. The bigger the prize, the bigger, the temptation to pull it off. This is not a minor issue.

ThumperPaul wrote on 03/04/24 at 06:13:58:

That is why I believe 48 States need to use the, "electoral vote" system.  (As it was designed)

Just think, last POTUS election in Calf 55 Blue, would have been 25 Red and 30 Blue.
Minn would have been 5 & 5, instead of 10 Blue.

Across the Nation, if the same system that Maine and Nebraska use, results would be quite different.

The, ' Electoral College' voting system was designed to give a high advantage to people living in, 'civilized' area.  (Large Cities districts)

Today the large Cites area, contain, UL's, and near-do-wells.

The people that live in, pay taxes in, work in, own property in, the far outskirts of the City, and in the, 'country'.
Their votes, DO NOT COUNT. Cause the 'city' people override the count. and', TAKE', their votes as theirs.

(Minn 5-5 in reality, Yet it was 10 for one, because 3 districts, took away the votes of 7 districts!)

MAJORTY RULES

More than 700 proposals have been introduced in Congress to reform or eliminate the Electoral College. There have been more proposals for Constitutional amendments on changing the Electoral College than on any other subject.

It’s an archaic system developed when there were only 13 states and the country wasn’t so polarized.  

People repeating “majority rules” favor an election process that gives equal weight to people with an average IQ or less.  That’s just dumb.  No thanks.

I also don’t buy the BS narrative (fear mongering again) that Democrats are more closely aligned with Socialism.  The elitists on both sides of the aisle are equally happy with passing out just enough to keep the working class under their control. The only real disagreement is how much is “just enough”.  And “just enough” isn’t simply about fiscal policy commonly associated with socialism.

thumperclone wrote on 03/04/24 at 10:11:39:


Again, low information voter. Majority doesn’t rule.

ThumperPaul wrote on 03/04/24 at 12:00:07:


Politicians are united when it comes to gaining power by handing out money. That’s absolutely true. Democrats are united on social topics that are clearly aligned with socialist philosophies.

And by the way, I appreciate your willingness to exchange comments. We desperately need new voices at this little table of ours.

I can give you solid, real world evidence the Democratic Party is alined with socialist ideas and in fact have put those into practice.

You cannot give me evidence the other way.