zevenenergie
Serious Thumper
Offline
SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 1250
The Netherlands Den Haag
|
That barbed wire is there for a reason. It means no access. I am completely in favor of rescuing people in need, but I also think that you can hang up a sign that says that if you have passed this line, then you are completely on your own, because we cannot get through either. Then you can still do it. helping people, but under the same conditions that they were willing to violate. You can be gentle, but then you shouldn't complain that there is an immigration problem. Then you should indeed say that we are going to receive the imigrants, provide them with a job, train them, give them a house, provide them with a good pension scheme and then build better roads to accommodate the influx of imigrants.
Where do you draw the line?
I'll just put it down because I see that it doesn't work for us. We have taken in a lot of refugees here, to a point where we can say more is not possible without causing problems, but we are forced by the government to take in immigrants than we can,t handle. I'm not going to work on that.
My question then is who benefits from this? The government, who doesn't want to make difficult decisions?
I have always wanted to stay out of these types of discussions, but for how long can that be? Isn't there something seriously wrong if you have to wonder? And doesn't that call for serious measures? Is doing nothing an option? Or is that a decision that you give up. I think there are no humane solutions to immigration problems if you fail as a government.
I am therefore in favor of electing a government that combats immigration at all costs. Because that kind of violence is already starting to emerge, but in a different way.
|