WebsterMark wrote on 01/07/24 at 11:11:03:Because drugs in general aren't the primary contributor to mass shootings, including transgender shooters. It would make no sense to say anything like that.
Define primary?
If a man who’s sad because of a break up, drinks until drunk and then kills someone in a crash, would you say alcohol is the primary contributor to the death?
I would say yes.
But in mass shootings there is an intent to kill and it does not come from drugs.
However, in both cases there are feelings and emotions involved.
And because someone does not want to feel those emotions (and therefore takes alcohol or drugs or avoids or postpones things), problems and emotional problems are not solved.
And that person no longer comes into situations that have a corrective effect on him. Because pain and fear must be faced so that it can resolve.
Such a person has his head full of thoughts.
And the mind is always anxious.
So he avoids even more situations.
(life)
Tis is the stage most people are in.
I think the primary cause of mass shootings is an advanced stage so that you can say this person is insane.
They are no longer in touch with the silence within themselves.
The whole hysteria surrounding the elections is also a distraction from the silence within us. This fascination with the thinking mind is the primary cause of all the problems in the world.
But because everyone has this fascination with the mind, we find it normal.
And we fail to see that mass shooters, for example, only have a slightly worse form of this fascination. With all its consequences.
So if you were to ask me; Define primary.
Then i say: The identification/fascination with the thinking mind.