Eegore
Serious Thumper
Offline
SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 8006
|
"There was no possibility of an insurrection. This is just complete nonsense."
I agree that there was no possibility. Again, I am saying people, specific humans, who travelled there to stop the process for the purpose of keeping Trump in power were part of an insurrection. One that could have never succeeded, but by definition, an insurrection specific to those humans engaging in those actions.
The people, specific humans, that had weapons, were armed. Combining the act of insurrection with the act of having a weapon means that those specific humans were armed insurrectionists.
I don't care what the "news" has to say. Yes it's overblown, but on the same side changing definitions to downplay the acts of people who actually committed crimes is just as bad. Some people assaulted the police, to say they only took selfies is wrong. Factually incorrect and ethically unsound.
To imprison people for insurrection if they were protesting is equally wrong.
This downplay of the specific actions of specific people is just as nonsensical as anyone claiming all the people there were insurrectionists.
"This was an unfortunate event fabricated by leftist media types into something it wasn’t and you’re just falling for it."
And the people that admit, in texts, media posts, video, that they went to stop the election and keep Trump in power? Also fabricated leftist media, or just people saying what they did and why?
|