Make it illegal to give water to voters waiting in line for hours to vote.

Brilliant  

Georgia's new controversial voting law bans volunteers from delivering free water and snacks to voters in line
https://www.businessinsider.com/ga-voting-law-bans-volunteers-from-delivering...

Let's put it just out of reach so when you step out of line you have to start over  

Have you managed to dig through the bullshit yet?
Who can and who can't provide for those waiting?

"I will give you water if you vote for me!"

That is what I understand this law is trying to mitigate.

So, the takeaway is

Law passed
And it's presented to the people as some kind of bizzaro  world reality where elderly black women must suffer if they want to vote
And lefties hop up and down
Howling about the inhumanity of Republicans and
Ohh,  FERFUKSAKE
Everything is forgotten
You learn nothing
And no
Voter id is not suppression.
,

Normal is not okay.
Just because it's normal, that spreading lies and calling yourself a reporter is normal, doesn't make it acceptable. It's gotten commonplace. It's harmful to society. It's divisive. The need to demonize Republicans by any means is tiresome. While Cuomo shoves CV positive people into nursing homes and makes millions selling a book on leadership, FFS. Republicans are bad,
I'm still laughing at the Delta CEO. It's wrong to require an ID to vote.

He forgot about the fact that it takes an ID to get on airplanes.

Just because some behaviors have become so prevalent that they can be called normal, that doesn't make it acceptable. When bad behavior goes without punishment it continues. The liars need to be made to feel some pain. I punish them by ignoring them.
They don't get a view from my TV, or Kindle.

Didn't it feel like bullshit? You Actually Believed Republicans forced a bill through like That? Now that you know
One

You believed a lie.
And you believed it because
You Know Republicans hate the voters and are heartless A55holes,
That supports your opinion.

Now you know you were duped.
Doesn't that say something about your source of information?
Doesn't it say something about YOU?

Voter suppression is de rigueur for the Right.
Taken individually, they nearly all have some justification, but often feeble ones.
Taken as a whole,... the object is clear.

"Voter suppression is de rigueur for the Right.
Taken individually, they nearly all have some justification, but often feeble ones.
Taken as a whole,... the object is clear."

 
 I'm not sure I can agree with this.  Not because it can't happen, just that it is known to be a poor electoral strategy given modern tech and methods.

 With the massive metadata we have now it was proven with the trump campaign that selective and focused ad campaigns can influence voters based off their online, phone and other social activities.  Before this massive data knowledge and ad methodology it would have made sense to suppress potential opposition votes.

 But today it seems much easier and more importantly - reliable to gain votes by targeted ads and economic policy.  Similar to the analogy used in this thread about denying water to people that won't say they will vote for your candidate.  That's a good way to piss people off.  Much easier to hand out water, be the good guy, and try to influence decisions that way.
Most people won't ever read actual law anyway and just believe whatever they are told by a source they emotionally like.