Serowbot wrote on 11/06/19 at 12:05:29:Quid pro quo.... it's in the summary of the phone call.
Corroborated by testimony from his own WH Chief of Staff, his own EU Ambassador Sondland, the Ukraine Ambassador, several Ukraine officials, Pentagon official Laura Cooper, Tim Morrison a top Russia and Europe adviser, Ukraine expert Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, and the original whistleblower.
... but Web still needs proof.
So for that matter does the entire Republican Party...
Waiting on God to write it in stone, I suppose?...
None of what you say is true. A smple reading of the transcript reveals no such "if you do this for me, Ill do that for you." All the people you cite have motives for giving an interpretation that's one explanation just like other people have motives for giving the opposite interpretation you wish to see. But, the words of the transcript do not say it, they simply don't. And the person on the other end has said there was nothing of the sort.
The original "whistleblower" said nothing. He merely gave his opinion of words and sought out others with similar opinions. All the FACTS point to the call being nothing more than what an honest reading of the transcript revealed.
You are duplicating the model used 9/11 conspiracy theorists. You have a theory; Trumps a bad guy. You read a transcript with couple thousand words. You search for a hidden meaning.
A 9/11 conspiracy theorist has a theory. He watches videos and looks for anything to prove his theory while ignoring all logic.