WebsterMark wrote on 10/31/18 at 14:18:14:It's because of a person's history. Who they are. What they've said in the past.
CONTEXT.
Liar.
Kavanaugh had zero history of being anything other than a upright person. Multiple FBI investigations, highest security clearance, hired by both Democrats and Republican judges etc... Never a word against him. One woman comes up with a story with no witness, no provable timeline, no provable anything..............and you instantly believer her 100%. Against all evidence and logic, you believer her. Against a man's entire life of, how did you put it...."because of a person's history. Who they are. What they've said in the past." ....and you believed her. You gave him no benefit of the doubt.
just to differentiate myself from those so you might, well, you don't care, you're quite happy lumping everyone into a simple to identify groups (black and white) but anyway, I'm going to tell you anyway, in Kavanaugh's original testimony, he went on about how he championed women in his hiring and at law schools and all that, and I thought, huh, okay, I like that, I might not have liked too much else about his past rulings and how conservative he was but that showed that he at least understood trying to make the world a better place through your own actions... so I thought, maybe he won't be the worst justice ever....
then he testified again after Ford.... wow, did he wipe out any good will I ever had towards him, he showed his true Animal House colors.... He doesn't deserve to be on the bench, in ANY court, let alone the Supreme Court, he acted a fool and I just hope he isn't too drunk on the bench.... dear lord, BEER, BEER, BEER, BEER!!!!!!
So liar, let's be honest, which is something obviously foreign to you. You 'context' is entirely based on partisanship or if they happen to have an R by their name, can they do to damage Trump. If so, you give them a pass based solely on that, nothing to do with history, or who they are or what they've said in the past.
Liar.
Web, you are the LAST person to talk about partisanship.... seriously .
context and nuance MATTERS, but again, you can only deal in black and white so i don't know how to make you realize that....