Dude, really?  What are you trying to defend?  Our president was dumb enough to hire this traitor.  Whether or not he knew is moot.  Either way it shows the incompetence of our president.


 I am not defending Trump in this case nor am I arguing about his competency. I am however pointing out how completely incompetent you are at analyzing a document. You read a couple of dates and assumed they  could be tied to trumps presidency when they  have nothing to do with that.  you should probably just stick to cutting and pasting other people's comments instead of trying to write your own.

WebsterMark wrote on 10/30/17 at 11:40:23:



Huh?  Seriously?  Well lookie here:   You read a couple of dates and assumed they  could not be tied to tweety's presidency, even though they cover the time while they were working for his campaign.

You see what I did there, hmm?

Get over it.  They guy you elected for president is beginning to unravel and you can't stand it.

I love it.

Thanks for playing.

WebsterMark wrote on 10/30/17 at 12:27:39:


Wow - well done web... but what, no pm this time?  LMAO!!

Well, you go right ahead and say what you like - oh, but you may want to also read count 11.  It's just a little thing regarding "False and Misleading FARA Statements".

Yeah, I'm sure it's nothing, right?

Anyhoo - the count lists "On or about November 23, 2016 and February 10, 2017, within the District of Columbia and elsewhere, the defendants PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., and RICHARD W. GATES III knowingly and willfully caused to be made a false statement of a material fact, and omitted a material fact necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, in a document filed with and furnished to the Attorney General under the provisions of FARA, to wit the underlined statements:"

I won't list the statements - you should and look for yourself.

Now, contrary to your "stellar" rebuttal, nowhere have I ever said that our president was directly involved, have I?

In fact, I said he probably didn't know that there was (allegedly) illegal activities going on in his own campaign.

You see web, like you, he's to ignorant to know what's legal and what's not.

However, that also doesn't make him innocent.

So, you go right on ahead calling me a "little girl" who's squealing at the news.

That's nothing compared to the squealing that paulie's gonna do on the entire, pathetic excuse of a presidential cabinet.  He's going for a plea deal and just wait to see how he sings!

Maybe someday you'll admit that your vote for tweety was a mistake, hmm?  Naw, that'll never happen...

Now you run along and ignore me.  You've done a great job up until now, huh??  

Anyhoo - the count lists "On or about November 23, 2016 and February 10, 2017, within the District of Columbia and elsewhere, the defendants PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., and RICHARD W. GATES III knowingly and willfully caused to be made a false statement of a material fact, and omitted a material fact necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, in a document filed with and furnished to the Attorney General under the provisions of FARA, to wit the underlined statements:"

You are mind numbingly ignorant....  They made statements on those dates that were false. The topics of the statements were done at some point in the past, not on those two dates. Get it?

WebsterMark wrote on 10/30/17 at 13:12:07:


Um, DOCUMENT....
"in a document filed with and furnished to the Attorney General under the provisions of FARA"

So... wanna retract, einstein?

T And T Garage wrote on 10/30/17 at 14:09:17:


Sorry, but you've freed Excalibur for a minute. Really? Are you that dumb? Do you read what you cut and paste? Try to read each word slowly and then picture in your head (probably in crayons) what occurred.

Okay, Excalibur going back to sleep for a while. Please don't be so stupid as to wake me again.

Oh, and even more from the indictments:

From paulie and dickie's:

38.  From in or about and between 2006 and 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, in the District of Columbia and elsewhere, the defendants PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., and RICHARD W. GATES III, together with others, knowingly and intentionally conspired to defraud the United States by impeding, impairing, obstructing, and defeating the lawful governmental functions of a government agency, namely the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury, and to commit offenses against the United States, to wit, the violations of law charged in Counts Three through Six and Ten through Twelve.

Notice what I highlighted?  

From papadopolous':

14.  On or about April 26, 2016, defendant PAPADOPOULOS met the Professor for breakfast at a London hotel. During this meeting, the Professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS that he had just returned from a trip to Moscow where he had met with high level Russian government officials. The Professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS that on that trip he (the Professor) learned that the Russians had obtained "dirt" on then-candidate Clinton. The Professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS, as defendant PAPADOPOULOS later described to the FBI, that "They [the Russians] have dirt on her"; "the Russians had emails of Clinton"; "they have thousands of emails."

Notice what I highlighted?  



Now, I know this is just a cut and paste post, but there seems to be a wealth of ignorance on these charges in this little forum.

I'm just trying to help out those who are less fortunate....


Mmmmmmm.... this tastes soooooo good!!!!