So I'm working on making my bike a chopper. I'm more interested in raising the front in via extended forks than going with a rake. I'm curious what all is involved with changing out your forks, where to get them, how much it cots, etc. Links to products would be even more appreciated.

Stock triple trees, with +4" forks from Franks Forks here is their website:
http://www.frankmain.qpg.com/

or search them on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/forkingbyfrank/

Process was: remove original forks, replace with new. Kept the original kickstand, bike leans a bit more than before.

How many miles did you ride stock?
What's it Like, compared to stock?
Did you notice any problems with maneuverability?
At some point, the angle of the tubes plus the friction inside the forks plus the springs and resistance of fluid passing through orifices would seem to tend to flex the tubes rather than compress the suspension.
I can't walk past a Springer and not study the design. The torque of braking should counter the Dive.

JOG, I had the bike for around five years and around 5000 miles in stock form before putting on the longer forks. The ride is not discernably better or worse, but the smile factor is 10 fold.

No maneuverability problems, but the geometry dictates that the turning circle must be wider. There is no flexing evident at this length and I have read that fork suppliers don't recommend putting forks longer than 4 inches over into stock trees possibly for that reason. As a precaution against twisting I put a Superbrace on the forks.

SoC, the forward control plates  (and linkages, seat, sissy bar, rear rack and tail assembly) were "Made by Blade". Rather than hijack this thread, I'll post all the details in the bike project section.

Here's another pic

SoC - not sure about the make of the forks but they do seem to work well - I've only taken the bike for a short ride - I'm waiting for the rain to stop falling here in the UK. Rubber side down has some projects in there

I don't think it looks good. Style over substance!

Just my opinion.
I can't imagine how it would handle. Horrible!
However, I defend his right to make the bike into anything he wants. :'(

Batman, thanks for the info, I was wondering what the stock rake on bike was. It's one of the specs/dimensions you often can't easily find. You also brought up some good points.

Me personally would never consider a 14º kit as it's too long and like you mentioned probably could creat a little instability in the whole thing.

The recommended new tubes with an AME 9º kit are 4" longer as I understand it. Apparently that maintains the bike level on front to back axis. The AME kits are distributed by ChoperSupply here in the states. I have reached out to them by email for some detailed info on the kits but they were not too forthcoming, particularly in the follow-up to my initial inquiry. I don't think it's they don't have a full understanding of the complete engineering and applications it may be more they just don't want to take the time to explain it all. When I requested some additional detailed follow-up they weren't overly supportive. They may be better on phone if I had called, just didn't want to waste their time until I scrape up the $2300 plus a kit from them costs.

AME claims they basically maintain the trail on the bike. I don't have a complete understanding of the kit and components though, just a surmise of how it all goes together from what sketchy technical I have been able to locate on web.

Basically, the kit not only includes new trees, it also includes new inserts/bushings for the frame tube. Unlike the stock tube inserts/bushings they have some sort of offset built into them that basically simulates a cut and reweld of the frame. That is, unlike the standard set up where the bolt basically passes through the tube in alignment with it, the new inserts change that, creating an offset so that the bolt and tube are no longer in parallel. With that though I may be wrong, like said I surmised it from info I have been able to review.

It does result in a difference in handling, though the claim is only slight with the 9º kit. Don't want to go into the whole math and angles discussion, it been hashed over before in other threads. It basically is a trade off for a little less maneuverability at low speed for a little more stability at high speed and a little less dip when on the front brake hard.

If anyone has experience with the kit and install would love to get some feedback from them. I have communicated with Arteacher who had the  9º kit and he recommended it as an improvement for his type of riding.

It's all about the exchange of ideas and info and I'd appreciate any specifc details folks may have about all this.