Wasn't the Civil War historically considered to be one of the first big wins in the federal power grab? Or am I a little off here?
Don't believe that garbage they teach you in elementary school. The Civil War wasn't just about slavery. There was more to it than that. I think Abe Lincoln once even offered to let them keep their slaves if they would stop fighting. Obviously, that didn't work. It's kinda interesting that, in a way, the Southerners were fighting for their own freedom, but then they wanted to keep other people as slaves.
If I correctly recall, the North was powerful and populous, relying on an industrial economy. Because of their high population, they were very powerful in Congress and got whatever they wanted while the Southern farmers got the shaft. The interests of two different cultures within one nation collided, and the result was secession and war.
What will happen when the interests of the socialistic, big city, big-government left collide with the back country, libertarian, small-government right? Hmmm... This reminds me of what happened 240 years ago. Those big government, big city yankees whipped the freedom-fighting back-country rebels. Seems like remnants of the cultures surrounding the Civil War are still with us today. Does an urban lifestyle somehow encourage support for big government, and does the seclusion of a rural lifestyle somehow encourage rebellion? Some interesting things to think about. Where do you see the most leftist policies? Generally around big cities like New York. Where do you see the opposite? In remote places like Alaska. Texas would be another example, but I reckon they have their own big cities. I guess they're just in a league of their own.
With increasing population, there seems to be a loss of freedom.