Saw more were released today.

See the same remarks from the Clinton camp, that they want them ALL released, so people can see she is hiding nothing, or did anything wrong.
Of course that is arguable, even her claim others did it, will not get a murderer off the hook if he claims the same defense  

My question is this: Since John Kerry is the current S.O.S., why does he not grant his good friend and compadre wish?

The trickle out seems to cause her more grief, as it sucks up fresh attention and ink each time a batch is released, however, it is not the opposition party who sits ranking in that department, which would really seem suspect, if it were.....

Anybody have a guess as to why?
I don't really buy the vetting excuse, as these emails were quickly scrutinized and deleted when it became apparent she had to turn them over, and if I remember correctly, it was reported that just one or two persons were in charge of that task, not a whole department.

I still think the FBI is preparing a criminal complaint against her, but not so much for dereliction of duty re: emails, tho I believe that will come, but not of the magnitude some are believing, no, but I think they have proof connecting the Clinton Foundation to her Office, where donors fared favorably, after contributing to Chelsea's baby shower gifts......
Hey, every baby needs a couple million school fund ya know  

Anyway..... anybody else wonder why Kerry does not weigh in on the State Department matters?    

Has it ever occurred to you,.. that are trickled intentionally, to damage her?...
Trickling out the info, keeps the possibility of scandal in the news...
The leaks don't come from the FBI... they come from the Republican-led House Intelligence Committee...

It's been dragged out forever...
...a political witch hunt, in search of a crime...
...you're being led by the nose...
Ask yourself,... Why else would this be dragged out?...
It's in no way to Hillary's benefit... it can only be to extend the duration of smear through the election cycle...
http://correctrecord.org/new-benghazi-report-proves-right-wing-wrong/

"Republicans have politicized the tragedy in Benghazi so much that now the American people don’t know what to believe, even though it has been investigated exhaustively. The investigations into Benghazi has included more than 50 senior level staff briefings, 13 public hearings, at least 3 independent/bipartisan reports, dozens of interviews, and the disclosure of more than 25,000 pages of documents.
Yet none of these investigations have yielded any evidence contrary to Secretary Clinton’s words and actions."

Serowbot wrote on 02/13/16 at 17:47:10:


Did you read my question?

Kerry is in charge of the State Department, where the emails are being released, NOT the Benghazi committee.

Who wears blinders?

Indeed, its always the others,  who makes us a victim, eh punkin.....  

Hillary has already taken responsibility,...

No, she has not. Taking responsibility means consequences, she received none. In fact, she's asking for a promotion.

i have a family member high up with a defense contractor. pretty high security clearance. i have no idea what he really does and neither does his wife. he was over during Super Bowl and we were talking about Fitbits. I bought my wife one and said he should get one but said he wouldn't be able to wear it at work. i asked why not and he said absolutely nothing with a blue tooth or anything not officially issued could be brought on site. immediate dismissal. But the Secy of State thinks she can have a server in her basement because its convenient? no sir.

Sew your politics is blinding you to this. you're like a republican arguing for Nixon not to resign. you're fighting for a woman who doesn't deserve your respect.

WebsterMark wrote on 02/14/16 at 05:37:50:


No Webby, he is like an Evangelical advising the pagans of their date with hell  

PS: But your point has merit. Fact, knowingly her emails had sensitive material, and now under subpoena, she made copy of, and gave it to her attorney, who had no clearance to handle such data.
Is this the actions of an innocent person, or one that knows she has legal concerns?  

WebsterMark wrote on 02/14/16 at 09:43:47:


The right would never move on, and one needs to consider this in electing her.
She has created this partisan environment just as much as anyone else.
A moth can complain all it wants about the flame, yet, who lit the candle?
She would consume too much energy and the right would willingly provide it, and nothing gets done, while the Wizard hides behind the curtains, still controlling events to his liking.

This is the chain of events we need to break, in order to free up the system, with the hope of repairing what is needed to reverse this course of corruption by the powerful.

Can we find a true leader, one who knows that absolutes often come at a cost of another?
Is compromise a dirty word?
Can anyone give, as well a receive, or has self become the criteria mankind operates from?  

working WITHIN the Constitution

Which is amendable and extendable, and where the thrust of compromise is hopefully vested.

Did you like my ankle?  

Well JOG, I don't stone deserving people to death anymore either