Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
mandating participation in commerce? (Read 296 times)
justin_o_guy2
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

What happened?

Posts: 55279
East Texas, 1/2 dallas/la.
Re: mandating participation in commerce?
Reply #30 - 12/28/15 at 10:51:28
 
There was a town that required citizens to own a gun.
I guess if it's okay for one to outlaw them, it's just as okay to require them.
I don't agree with either position.
Though, just as I believe it's smart to wear a seat belt, I believe it is smart to be armed. And, again, the government has no right to decide for me.
I can hear the shrieking.
But, YOU choosing to Not wear a seatbelt exposes Society to losses and costs, so you Must wear it.
Okay, maybe that's true. Maybe My irresponsible behavior Does expose society to costs. Was there a time when that wasn't true? Was there a time when , if I was foolish and got hurt, that only I and maybe family and friends were impacted?

Let's talk about this. Because THIS is leading toward a concept.
Freedom. And the personal responsibility that is inexorably attached to it.

You believe in the individual being responsible to the community?
Then you believe in the individual being able to protect himself.

Back to top
 
 

The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.- Edmund Burke.
  IP Logged
raydawg
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 11551
pacific northwest
Gender: male
Re: mandating participation in commerce?
Reply #31 - 12/28/15 at 11:34:43
 
JOG.....

Here is an exchange from one of my all time favorite movies.

If you are not familiar with the movie " As Good as it Gets" then I will briefly set the scene.

Jack Nicholson ( Melvin) is an author, and by this woman's question she queries him as to how he captures a woman's perspective so aptly.

Receptionist: I can't resist! You usually move through here so quickly and I just have so many questions I want to ask you. You have no idea what your work means to me.

Melvin Udall: What does it mean to you?

Receptionist: [stands up] When somebody out there knows what it's like...
[place one hand on her forehead and the other over her heart]
Receptionist: ... to be in here.

Melvin Udall: Oh God, this is like a nightmare.
[Turns around and presses the elevator button multiple times]

Receptionist: Oh come on! Just a couple of questions. How hard is that?
[Scampers up to Melvin]

Receptionist: How do you write women so well?

Melvin Udall: I think of a man, and I take away reason and accountability.  


JOG, I would suggest this is also explain how liberals think too  Grin
Back to top
 
 

“The biggest big business in America is not steel, automobiles, or television. It is the manufacture, refinement and distribution of anxiety.”—Eric Sevareid (1964)
  IP Logged
Serowbot
YaBB Moderator
ModSquad
*****
Offline

OK.... so what's the
speed of dark?

Posts: 28390
Tucson Az
Gender: male
Re: mandating participation in commerce?
Reply #32 - 12/28/15 at 11:35:27
 
justin_o_guy2 wrote on 12/28/15 at 10:51:28:
...it's smart to wear a seat belt,...

Not on my bike... Huh
Back to top
 
 

Ludicrous Speed !... ... Huh...
  IP Logged
LostArtist
Ex Member




Re: mandating participation in commerce?
Reply #33 - 12/28/15 at 12:43:30
 
DesertRat wrote on 12/27/15 at 07:37:16:
Is it constitutional?



if it's not, how do you justify paying for food, water and shelter? These are all things that ARE PAID for, maybe not by the poor person using them, but someone PAID for them for someone else to use.

in capitalism, everything is commerce and participation in commerce IS MANDATED by capitalism
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Dane Allen
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Carpe Diem!!

Posts: 1217
Riverside, CA
Gender: male
Re: mandating participation in commerce?
Reply #34 - 12/28/15 at 13:49:53
 
DesertRat wrote on 12/27/15 at 14:01:42:
Is mandating participation in commerce constitutional?

"Congress cannot mandate any American to engage in commerce against their will."

Any other examples, besides OblamoCare, where Congress has asserted its Commerce clause authority to require the purchase of a private product?

So, tell me again, are we truly FREE? What next?


It is completely unconstitutional and we are not a free people any longer. Socialism is the Trojan horse that is putting us further into chains. And, yes, there is a much further fall, we are no where near rock bottom. Our Stalin is out there, probably in a University right now.
Back to top
 
 

RIP!! 01/2012-09/2016 S40 Boulevard, Raptor Pet, Rotella T6 Synth, Verslavy CC Tensioner -- You left too soon.
  IP Logged
Dane Allen
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Carpe Diem!!

Posts: 1217
Riverside, CA
Gender: male
Re: mandating participation in commerce?
Reply #35 - 12/28/15 at 13:53:54
 
LostArtist wrote on 12/28/15 at 12:43:30:
DesertRat wrote on 12/27/15 at 07:37:16:
Is it constitutional?



if it's not, how do you justify paying for food, water and shelter? These are all things that ARE PAID for, maybe not by the poor person using them, but someone PAID for them for someone else to use.

in capitalism, everything is commerce and participation in commerce IS MANDATED by capitalism


I think you are confusing Commerce with Economics in part of that statement but absolutely nothing is mandated by capitalism with regard to commerce.
Back to top
 
 

RIP!! 01/2012-09/2016 S40 Boulevard, Raptor Pet, Rotella T6 Synth, Verslavy CC Tensioner -- You left too soon.
  IP Logged
LostArtist
Ex Member




Re: mandating participation in commerce?
Reply #36 - 12/28/15 at 15:09:52
 
Dane Allen wrote on 12/28/15 at 13:53:54:
LostArtist wrote on 12/28/15 at 12:43:30:
DesertRat wrote on 12/27/15 at 07:37:16:
Is it constitutional?



if it's not, how do you justify paying for food, water and shelter? These are all things that ARE PAID for, maybe not by the poor person using them, but someone PAID for them for someone else to use.

in capitalism, everything is commerce and participation in commerce IS MANDATED by capitalism


I think you are confusing Commerce with Economics in part of that statement but absolutely nothing is mandated by capitalism with regard to commerce.


no, it is, capitalism places monetary values on EVERYTHING, food is not a right, it's a commodity to be sold, shelter is not a right, it is a commodity to be sold, even water is not a right, it is a commodity to be sold. Luckily capitalists haven't figured out how to make air into a commodity quite yet.  

in our capitalist society, you are required to BUY food, to BUY shelter, to BUY water. everything has a cost to it at some point and someone is paying it via COMMERCE.  

even your very birth is capitalized on. nothing is FREE.

now if you want, I guess you can drop out of society as much as possible and be a bum and catch your own food, fishing or however. skin your catches and make your own clothing and stuff, (the Amish and maybe some Native American societies do this)

but in general, in our society, yes, commerce is mandated by strong societal norms, not laws.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Serowbot
YaBB Moderator
ModSquad
*****
Offline

OK.... so what's the
speed of dark?

Posts: 28390
Tucson Az
Gender: male
Re: mandating participation in commerce?
Reply #37 - 12/28/15 at 15:40:05
 
As I said before,.. if that's a problem for you, we can fix it by socializing it...
All it takes is an expansion of Medicare to cover everyone...

See how easy that was?.... Grin
Back to top
 
 

Ludicrous Speed !... ... Huh...
  IP Logged
LostArtist
Ex Member




Re: mandating participation in commerce?
Reply #38 - 12/28/15 at 17:02:36
 
.?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
MnSpring
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Younger than most
people my age.

Posts: 9014
Minn
Gender: male
Re: mandating participation in commerce?
Reply #39 - 12/28/15 at 17:02:38
 
" ... is it constitutional to mandate participation in commerce? ..."  

I believe not.

Who decides what is good for the individual?

A rabbit goes into a Fox Den. Who decides what’s for Lunch ?
A Town Board, (or the like), in Syria. Who decides what clothing Women should wear ?
A State Legislation, ( who know nothing about current firearm laws, never purchased a firearm, never used a firearm, are afraid of a firearm). Who decides what the Laws about Firearms should be ?
A Federal Legislation, (who knows Nothing about Health Care, Never paid a premium out of pocket). Who decides what H.A. should be for the individual ?

The Pendulum, has swung  to far the other way.

Back to top
 
 

Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither".
Which is More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly .
  IP Logged
MnSpring
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Younger than most
people my age.

Posts: 9014
Minn
Gender: male
Re: mandating participation in commerce?
Reply #40 - 12/28/15 at 17:19:22
 
Oh, and:  “ … paying for food, water and shelter? …”
A person does not,  HAVE, to pay for those thing.
Many people, ‘Choose’, by mater of convince. They don’t  HAVE  to !

So much the same as a Car/Truck.
Some people say, a person, HAS TO, have a D.L. and register the car, and get License tabs each year.

Wrong.  a 12 year old, CAN,  Buy a car/truck. And if that car/truck is used on private property. ANYBODY, can drive it, use it, own it, and NOT get a Lic for it. ANYBODY.

If, you want to use that on a, ‘Public’, road. A different story.   But again, you don’t  HAVE to ! Unless you want to go from point A to point B. (In a car/truck), which travels over Public Roads, (which many people do, for sake of convince).  
BUT, you do  NOT, ‘HAVE’ to, if you walk, use a bicycle, or use a horse & buggy.

Back to top
 
 

Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither".
Which is More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly .
  IP Logged
justin_o_guy2
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

What happened?

Posts: 55279
East Texas, 1/2 dallas/la.
Re: mandating participation in commerce?
Reply #41 - 12/28/15 at 17:55:38
 
LostArtist wrote on 12/28/15 at 15:09:52:
Dane Allen wrote on 12/28/15 at 13:53:54:
LostArtist wrote on 12/28/15 at 12:43:30:
DesertRat wrote on 12/27/15 at 07:37:16:
Is it constitutional?



if it's not, how do you justify paying for food, water and shelter? These are all things that ARE PAID for, maybe not by the poor person using them, but someone PAID for them for someone else to use.

in capitalism, everything is commerce and participation in commerce IS MANDATED by capitalism


I think you are confusing Commerce with Economics in part of that statement but absolutely nothing is mandated by capitalism with regard to commerce.


no, it is, capitalism places monetary values on EVERYTHING, food is not a right, it's a commodity to be sold, shelter is not a right, it is a commodity to be sold, even water is not a right, it is a commodity to be sold. Luckily capitalists haven't figured out how to make air into a commodity quite yet.  

in our capitalist society, you are required to BUY food, to BUY shelter, to BUY water. everything has a cost to it at some point and someone is paying it via COMMERCE.  

even your very birth is capitalized on. nothing is FREE.

now if you want, I guess you can drop out of society as much as possible and be a bum and catch your own food, fishing or however. skin your catches and make your own clothing and stuff, (the Amish and maybe some Native American societies do this)

but in general, in our society, yes, commerce is mandated by strong societal norms, not laws.


The government isn't Mandating that you buy anything. It's your choice. You don't Have to Buy food. You can raise your own, be a hunter/gatherer, beggar or thief.

The obvious disdain for capitalism is gut wrenching. Would it be wrong of me to believe that You don't want to work for free? Or do you believe that everyone should be fed, clothed,housed, cared for medically equally, regardless of what jobs they perform? Do you believe in merit ? Are outcomes for everyone supposed to be equal? Does the idea of entrepreneurship and wealth creation do anything for you? Do you understand that wealth creation by one individual does not take from anyone else?

I have time. Please, answer each question.
Back to top
 
 

The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.- Edmund Burke.
  IP Logged
raydawg
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 11551
pacific northwest
Gender: male
Re: mandating participation in commerce?
Reply #42 - 12/28/15 at 19:11:44
 
JOG......

Life should be fair.
Its only their attempt at making it fair for all.

They care more than you do.

Everyone deserves a chance and the pursuit of happiness.

One should not be born with an advantage, or have access to a better life because they were born to better circumstance.

We have seen how we must consider feelings, over results, and no longer keep score in some children sport games.

We must not consider gender either, access to all, equally.

I am waiting for this reasoning to extend to the NBA.
We need to have quotas that echo our population, as it is not fair height challenged folk like bot, will never be able to overcome his born shortcomings, and afford the trappings and chicks NBA players get to have.....
This is wrong  Angry
To use the excuse these BIG guys create more wealth, and are therefor entitled to share in with that windfall, well heck, it ain't american  Grin  
Back to top
 
 

“The biggest big business in America is not steel, automobiles, or television. It is the manufacture, refinement and distribution of anxiety.”—Eric Sevareid (1964)
  IP Logged
LostArtist
Ex Member




Re: mandating participation in commerce?
Reply #43 - 12/28/15 at 20:00:19
 
justin_o_guy2 wrote on 12/28/15 at 17:55:38:
LostArtist wrote on 12/28/15 at 15:09:52:
Dane Allen wrote on 12/28/15 at 13:53:54:
LostArtist wrote on 12/28/15 at 12:43:30:
DesertRat wrote on 12/27/15 at 07:37:16:
Is it constitutional?



if it's not, how do you justify paying for food, water and shelter? These are all things that ARE PAID for, maybe not by the poor person using them, but someone PAID for them for someone else to use.

in capitalism, everything is commerce and participation in commerce IS MANDATED by capitalism


I think you are confusing Commerce with Economics in part of that statement but absolutely nothing is mandated by capitalism with regard to commerce.


no, it is, capitalism places monetary values on EVERYTHING, food is not a right, it's a commodity to be sold, shelter is not a right, it is a commodity to be sold, even water is not a right, it is a commodity to be sold. Luckily capitalists haven't figured out how to make air into a commodity quite yet.  

in our capitalist society, you are required to BUY food, to BUY shelter, to BUY water. everything has a cost to it at some point and someone is paying it via COMMERCE.  

even your very birth is capitalized on. nothing is FREE.

now if you want, I guess you can drop out of society as much as possible and be a bum and catch your own food, fishing or however. skin your catches and make your own clothing and stuff, (the Amish and maybe some Native American societies do this)

but in general, in our society, yes, commerce is mandated by strong societal norms, not laws.


The government isn't Mandating that you buy anything. It's your choice. You don't Have to Buy food. You can raise your own, be a hunter/gatherer, beggar or thief.

You can't raise your own without paying someone something for land and the resources needed to raise your own. Yes you can be a hunter gatherer, but at some point you are going to have to buy something to use for your gathering or your hunting.  beggars and thieves are still CONSUMING something that has value, they are taking part in commerce, raising prices by stealing and increasing the cost of protection of goods to market or protection of goods at home, or the cost to jail them, etc. there is a COST to their activities which will be reflected in the marketplace, meaning the REST of us will pay for it so those activities force us all to pay for that commerce.


The obvious disdain for capitalism is gut wrenching.

I don't disdain capitalism, I just understand that capitalism isn't all sprinkles and unicorns and rainbow farts, it's not capitalism that I disdain, it's the worst of the worst kinds of GREED that abuse capitalism

Would it be wrong of me to believe that You don't want to work for free?


this is irrelevant, working for free isn't an option, it doesn't matter if I want to or not, capitalism DEMANDS that I get paid, capitalism mandates that a value be placed on my labor, I only get to choose what kind of labor I do, I only want to be paid because things cost money, things like rent and food and entertainment I would love to be creative and add to society as a productive member without being BRIBED to do so



Or do you believe that everyone should be fed, clothed,housed, cared for medically equally, regardless of what jobs they perform?

 you think that people should just die? allowed to starve, go naked and allowed to die of disease UNLESS they add value to your view of society? if so, you believe that human life has no innate value and are an evil person

now can people upgrade their healthcare and lifestyle? yes of course, but there should be some basic level of those things for everyone  



Do you believe in merit ?

Yes, what the hell does that have to do with mandating commerce?

Are outcomes for everyone supposed to be equal?

no, I'm not arguing that ANYWHERE HERE, quit bringing YOUR BIAS that you think I'm saying and listen to what I'M ACTUALLY SAYING

Does the idea of entrepreneurship and wealth creation do anything for you?

No, not really, I'm not motivated by money, sorry, just doesn't work for me. I'm motivated by problem solving and the problem itself, sometimes that problem is money, as in how to get it to pay the rent, food, etc... you know FORCED commerce so I got a job that solves those problems

Do you understand that wealth creation by one individual does not take from anyone else?

Yes, again, I'm not arguing anything for or against that here, that AGAIN HAS NOTHING to do with forced commerce.


I have time. Please, answer each question.




the question of this thread is "Mandating participation in commerce?"  and simply, Capitalism mandates participation in commerce.
 without participation in commerce Capitalism FAILS. We live in a capitalist society, which is awesome, I engage happily in capitalism to the best of my judgment and ability.  But I'm not idiotic enough to think that capitalism is all sprinkles and unicorns, it has it's bad side, mainly the golden rule "those that have the gold MAKE THE RULES"  but currently it's the best system in the world and as far as I can tell it has the best chance to solve many of humanity's problems if it's guided by moral principles, it's the erosion of those principles that's the problem.  

and lets be clear here, especially about healthcare, those of us who have been buying health insurance have ALWAYS been forced into commerce to pay for those who have not been buying health insurance. OUR PREMIUMS go up when emergency room visits go up and doctors and other healthcare assets go unpaid by those that don't have health insurance and USE healthcare. Those that had/have the gold set it up that way a long time ago.  

Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
LostArtist
Ex Member




Re: mandating participation in commerce?
Reply #44 - 12/28/15 at 20:04:09
 
DesertRat wrote on 12/27/15 at 15:14:01:
I just can't wrap my head around the fact that SCOTUS ruled that we must participate in commerce for a private product.

Agree or not, I am NOT free, a slave, if I am forced to do anything.



except that it's not a PRIVATE product. INSURANCE is a publicly held commodity, those of us that buy it actually end up paying for those in the public that don't buy it but use it anyway.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
05/24/24 at 04:24:40



General CategoryPolitics, Religion (Tall Table) › mandating participation in commerce?


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.