England, Australia banned guns and this and that to stop against ... get this ... psycho massacres. That's the classic sledgehammer to pick your teeth.
To stop a psycho the solution is to have $100 a bullet tax. Even that is only like ... using a smaller hammer to pick your teeth. It will bite into criminals, and legitimate defence users.

US will have to stop the gun flow from mexico, for things the way they stand right now, drugs come in and guns go out. If we reverse the flow, we will 1/2 the drugs coming in.

Jamaica and what ever, a whole other problem, stopping criminals from getting guns, US made guns, bought in US legitimately and handed over to a criminal, we dont even have the ability to stop the guy that is handing it over. That is illegal, its called "trafficking" ... we keep records of serial numbers, rifling etc, we will almost instantly toss the trafficker in jail.

Once again, they may make guns, they may make bullets ... we can worry about those then. As it stands now, they buy guns in SC using a non criminal record criminal associate who hands it over to the criminal in NYC.

The Power of the second amendment, perfectly used by the criminal against the law abiding.
Do criminals have the full powers granted under constitution ? yes or no ?

Well if your answer is yes, I got nothing to say to you.

If it was no - well, criminals have friends who are not. They are supplying them with the rights granted by the constitution. Or atleast the second. Maybe you're cool with that.

Cool.
Srinath.