I'll take a guess and say it was done by a loner, somebody who had a ax to grind with society.
 Can't see how any conspiracy theory could fit what little info the media has been feeding us and none of the big terrorist groups have stepped up and taken responsablity for the bombing.
 Small simply made bombs on individual timers points to a loner.
 Conspiracies have a reason for the action or possibly the reaction caused by the bombing. This looks like someone who was just  pi$$ed off about something and needed to make a violent statement.  For all we know the bomber could of been fired from a company who helped sponser the run and he was getting "even".
 I don't like trying to get into the minds of nut jobs, It is too easy to cross the line and become a nut also.

BBC video feed may be far more delayed than their headset and audio feed.

You know that the Janet jackson nipple slip - we may have never seen it on TV right ... they had something like a 3-4 minute delay and  the decision to "show" it was made by the CEO of CBS ...

The BBC delay may be 20+ mins, they may have heard it on their headset, the video feed took its sweet time to get shown.

Cool.
Srinath.

Sri the building was still standing in the background when she announced it had fallen. You can see the building standing the whole time while she was talking about it falling. Take the time to watch the video. 20 minutes after she announced it had fallen it fell inside itself just like a building falls when demolition experts rig it. It was live broadcast TV. I don't see how anyone can even think about arguing with this one.

Horse crap

You know that the Janet jackson nipple slip - we may have never seen it on TV right ... they had something like a 3-4 minute delay and  the decision to "show" it was made by the CEO of CBS ...

I call BS on that.

 


Victory for 9/11 Justice!
Inbox
x



Apr 15 (1 day ago)

to undisclosed recipients
Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV
license fee because the BBC
intentionally misrepresented facts
about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged.

It is widely known that the BBC
reported the collapse of World Trade
Center Building 7 over 20 minutes
before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-
story skyscraper that was not hit by
a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at
free-fall speed later that day.

So Rooke said the BBC had to have
had prior knowledge to a terror attack
making them complicit in the attack.
He presented the BBC footage to the
judge along with a slew of other evidence,
and the judge agreed that Rooke had a
reasonable case to protest. Rooke was
found not guilty and he was not fined
for failure to pay the licensing fee.

Video (about 8 and a half mins):

Victory for 9/11 Justice!

Here is the broadcast where the BBC
announced the collapse of WTC 7 while
it was still standing behind the reporter:

Video (about 9 mins)

BBC Reports Collapse of WTC Building 7 Over 20 mins Early

Midnightrider wrote on 04/16/13 at 20:37:50:



No Duhhh..

That the dumb masses cant see whats coming is enough to piss a guy OFF.

The economy is teetering on the edge, so, theyre preparing for a Seriously angry populace..
Theyve been working us over for decades. War after war to transfer wealth to the elite, who make $$ off both sides, making & selling weapons.

Even Rockefeller stated that the elite are in trouble because more people are awake now than ever, that was 2 years ago,, & the number who see whats going on have increased over that time.
Jerry, youre an embarrassment