Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Did anyone see the video of the guys in black? (Read 282 times)
Midnightrider
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Alliance Member

Posts: 3244
Winston Salem, NC
Re: Did anyone see the video of the guys in black?
Reply #30 - 02/04/13 at 13:21:01
 
Is the US getting ready for a war don’t know about?

And, if that’s why Washington is stockpiling massive amounts of ammunition (hollow points, by the way), why is Homeland Security doing the buying instead of the Defense Department?

I have some theories.

Many of you will remember a story I broke a long time ago – about presidential candidate Barack Obama’s little-noticed announcement that, if elected in 2008, he wanted to create a “civilian national security force” as big, as strong and as well-funded as the Defense Department.

Here’s what he actually said at a campaign stop in Colorado July 2, 2008: “We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”


Want to make sure you and your family are fully protected? Check out our self-defense section in WND’s Superstore.

Could what we see happening now in the Department of Homeland Security be the beginning of Obama’s dream and our constitutional nightmare?

We’ve learned more about Obama’s vision since then. Maybe it’s time for a review:

He made the campaign promise to build this $439 billion domestic army, but all references to the initiative were inexplicably deleted from the copy of his speech posted on his website while others mysteriously disappeared from transcripts of the speech distributed by the campaign. That was strange – and ominous.
At the time, I had never heard anyone use the phrase “civilian national security force” before. But I did a little homework and found out where it originated. It was first proposed by then Bush administration Defense Secretary Robert Gates. On that basis alone, I accurately predicted that, if elected, Obama would name Gates as his own defense secretary. Needless to say, when that appointment came to pass, no media outlet bothered to interview me about my foresight.
Still during the campaign of 2008, I suggested that what Obama had in mind might be something very sinister indeed – perhaps “some kind of domestic Big Brother program.”
We never heard another mention of Obama’s “civilian national security force” again. Not in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 or 2012.

But that brings us up to 2013 and the highly unusual stockpiling of firearms and ammo by Homeland Security – firearms and ammo that Obama would like to deny to ordinary citizens who are not members of his domestic army.

Well, I hate to say it, but I may have predicted this, too.

In a Halloween column last fall, I stated that, if re-elected, Obama would “declare a full-scale war on his domestic opposition.”

I wasn’t joking. I was deadly serious – so serious, in fact, that I did something I pledged I would never do: Vote for Mitt Romney. It was a matter of self-defense and self-preservation. I said then that a second term of Obama might mean we would never see another free and fair election in America. (I’m not even sure we saw one in 2012.) I suggested due process would go the way of the horse and buggy. I said I expected Obama would move to shut down or destroy all independent media. I even speculated that his biggest critics would eventually be rounded up in the name of national security.

Think about it.

Why does the civilian Department of Homeland Security need billions of rounds of ammunition?

This is the agency that is responsible for policing the border. But it doesn’t.

This is the agency that is responsible for catching terrorists. But it doesn’t.

So why does Homeland Security need so many weapons and enough hollow-point rounds to plug every American six times?

Maybe this is the “civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the Defense Department.

These words – “civilian national security force” – have haunted me ever since I first read them.

Obama has never explained what he meant.

He’s never been called to account for that remark.

Doesn’t this sound like police-state talk to you?

The U.S. Army alone has nearly 500,000 troops. That doesn’t count reserves or National Guard. In 2007, the U.S. defense budget was $439 billion. No one knows what the budget is today because Congress stopped passing budgets when Obama took office.

Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger and more expensive than that? Is this part of his second-term agenda?

He has also set up, as I have reported, a new homeland security bureaucracy to operate under his own direction.

I think it’s worth recalling here that just over a year ago both houses of Congress unwisely passed the defense reauthorization bill that killed the concept of habeas corpus – legislation that authorized the president to use the U.S. military to arrest and indefinitely detain American citizens without charge or trial.

That legislation would empower a lame-duck Obama to use all of the power of the federal government – constitutional and unconstitutional – to target his political enemies.

If any Republican, conservative, independent journalist, pro-life activist, returning veteran, gun-rights activist, constitutionalist, Bible believer or critic of Obama thinks they will be safe in a second term under this would-be despot, they had better think again – real fast.

The “civilian national security force” is not here to protect any of them. It’s here to destroy the opposition. It’s here to destroy liberty. It’s here to destroy the Constitution.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/why-is-government-stockpiling-guns-ammo/#Yy1X2P5dY...                                  I didnt write this, I'm just passin it along. Hope you enjoyed it Webster.
Back to top
 
 


"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 12854

Gender: male
Re: Did anyone see the video of the guys in black?
Reply #31 - 02/04/13 at 15:13:49
 
He has also set up, as I have reported, a new homeland security bureaucracy to operate under his own direction.

Hope you enjoyed it Webster.

Midnight; I loath Obama. I'm willing to bet 10 times more than you do. I think he's the most anti-American President we've ever had or ever will have. He will do more damage than Jimmy Carter x 10!

But..................... he is not creating a secret army. He is not ordering the attack on a grade school to control guns....... Come on now; be serious.


Think about this for a minute. Haven't you read how many Sheriffs have publically stated they will NOT enforce any Presidential executive order when it comes to gun control they consider contrary to the 2nd Amendment? I read an article today that said hundreds have signed a document that said they would not follow those orders.

Now, do you think for one second the average military GI or officier is going to shoot on unarmed US citizens because Barrack Obama told him to? Really? ( and don’t go back to Kent State as some kind of example either. That was a bunch of National Guard troops surrounded by protesters, they were scared)  What you’re suggesting is Obama somehow changing the mindset of everyday ordinary Americas who serve in the military,  to turn the US into a police state because the President said so.  

Starlifter and Sew have a couple giant size man crushes on Obama and even they would not do that. The military overwhelming supported Romney and usually always vote Republican. You think they are going to kill because Obama told them to?....
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Serowbot
YaBB Moderator
ModSquad
*****
Offline

OK.... so what's the
speed of dark?

Posts: 28387
Tucson Az
Gender: male
Re: Did anyone see the video of the guys in black?
Reply #32 - 02/04/13 at 15:50:13
 
WebsterMark wrote on 02/04/13 at 15:13:49:
Starlifter and Sew have a couple giant size man crushes on Obama and even they would not do that.

Ooooooh!,.... O b a m a......  Kiss Kiss Kiss...

Grin...
Back to top
 
 

Ludicrous Speed !... ... Huh...
  IP Logged
Midnightrider
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Alliance Member

Posts: 3244
Winston Salem, NC
Re: Did anyone see the video of the guys in black?
Reply #33 - 02/05/13 at 07:37:37
 
Web I said at the end of the article I didnt write it, I just throwed it out there for conversation. I got along with Obama just fine until he decided he wanted my guns. No way. He's smart enough to realise he's about to start a civil war so there will be about 6 months of politician bullshit and he'll tax the hell out of guns and ammo. He's got a lot bigger problems to geal with. When Asia and certain Arab countries sart trading with gold backed currency we're through economically. The gold backed Yuan will destroy our economy as early as 2016. Obama knows it. All that ammo that is being bought by the goverment isnt for target practice. They've bought enough rounds to shoot each of us 6 times. I dont claim to know whats going on inside Wasington, I can only speculate but I'm keeping my guns. This we're the greatest nation in the world one nation under God is bullshit. Look what we did to the innocents in Iran. How many innocent children has Obama already killed with his drones.  I dont know what Obama is capable of. When he brings Rappers to the White House whose songs brag about killing white people and LEO's I qiuckly lose my respect for him. He's a lot smarter than Romney, its the Pubs fault thay lost the election. The only canditate that ran with half a brain was Newt. I think Romney was one of the greatest govenors Mass ever had but when he ran for pres he did a 180 on everything he did in Mass. Big Mistake, he was a great bipartisan leader in Mass. Whether Obama is planning to go socialist and putting miltary guard on every steetcorner or not I dont know. I do know one thing, our currency will collapse. Ron Paul knew it. When it does I'll have my guns.
Back to top
 
 


"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 12854

Gender: male
Re: Did anyone see the video of the guys in black?
Reply #34 - 02/05/13 at 13:20:07
 
I am metaphorically waving the white flag...
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Midnightrider
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Alliance Member

Posts: 3244
Winston Salem, NC
Re: Did anyone see the video of the guys in black?
Reply #35 - 02/05/13 at 15:39:35
 
Web what have I said to make you wave the white flag LOL.
Back to top
 
 


"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"
  IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
05/19/24 at 00:30:09



General CategoryPolitics, Religion (Tall Table) › Did anyone see the video of the guys in black?


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.