LANCER wrote on 01/07/13 at 02:52:57:My point is that, most of the time, we will not know who is going to do evil until it is done. That is not a pleasant thought but it is a fact. We cannot read a persons mind and we do not know all of what is in a persons heart, whether it is to do good or evil.
The only way for us, as a society, to "minimize" these kinds of horrible things is to encourage good and right behavior in the society, and we do that one person at a time. I taught my children that there is RIGHT & WRONG, to do good things for each other, be kind to each other. When someone in a society does bad/evil things to others they should be punished according to the laws that the society has established. If they take something that is not theirs they should be punished and made to repay 2x. If they hurt someone they should be punished with substantial jail time. If they "murder" someone then their life is taken.
There is an important difference between murder and kill. The intentional taking of a life with malice and forethought is totally different than having to kill someone in self defense. Murder is wrong; having to kill someone in self defense is our RIGHT to life.
Does that make sense to you ?
Make sense ... yes, are we willing to live under this reality - hell no.
A $100 bullet will stop this mass killing mentality, and not affect the self defence crowd. That is until we keep guns out of whacko's hands.
You make all these theories with the supposition that "there are tons of guns out there, no way to get it all back, so we are going to do something useless and ineffectual ...
I think a 100 buck bullet will promptly drive all the bullets into safes. That way the whacko's have to after getting their gun, have to go and spend 5-6g in bullets for a rampage. Cash only ...
Since we are all armed already, we would retain our bullets till we have shot them @ an intruder and then we would buy ...
Heck, I would give an exepmtion to people who have shot someone in self defence - cops come and find a shot/dead intruder and the home owner has shot him 5 times and used up 20 bullets, OK he gets a letter saying he's entitled to 20 bullets. The cops could just dispense it @ the scene of the crime after ruling it as self defence.
Cool.
Srinath.