dennis wrote:
********* Auto Generated Form Email **********
Subject: Poor mans bike stand,
Comments or Questions: After working with timber all my working life (now retired) i would feel happier if the eyes that hold the straps to the 4 x 2 were threaded through the timber with a nut and washer on the other side,end grain is not a good fixing in that situation, not a criticism, it's a brill idea, my comment is made with safety in mind, Regards Dennis REOC 10055.
email Address:
Make optional: Royal Enfield Model "G"
Model optional: "G"
This message is auto-generated by your web site when the form is submitted by a site visitor on page "Contact_Me". No need to reply.Hi Dennis,
Well, you have a good point, but let me explain how this happened.
My background with timber is pretty extensive too, because I've had splinters embedded in my fingers from just about every type of wood that is commonly available at Home Depot...
As the title of the bike stand suggests, I built the stand when I was really broke. I had to use what I had on hand. The tie down "eyes" that I had available were the "screw type", and therefore I felt that running them through (side to side) might actually cause the wood to split. From my experience, it seemed that running screws with the grain would have less of a splitting effect. It also seemed that I'd be using more of the wood to hold the screws since the board is only 1 1/2 thick anyway. I did drill a pilot hole at any rate.
Oh yeah, I also placed the "eyes" in the center on the end of the board. My reasoning was to prevent the straps from creating an upward twisting torque on the 2 x 4 which might loosen it from the base.
I do admit that if I had had some "eye bolts" with nut and washer that I'd have done it, as you suggest. The washer would distribute the "forces" over a wider area of wood and the through hole would not have the same splitting effect. So I agree with your comment. However, if you decide to build one of these stands, you will also find that you need very little tension on the straps to actually hold the bike vertical. After all, just think about how much force you exert to keep your Enfield upright when you are sitting on it. Not much, unless the bike actually begins to tip past the center of gravity.
On a side note, let me mention this. Both of my "eyes" are bent on my "one and only prototype". In all my testing, goofing around plus actual work with the stand, the eyes have become bent in a rearward direction, and the wood has not split at all. Maybe I just got lucky.
One real improvement that I would make to the Poor Man's Bike Stand would be the length of the base. In hindsight, I'd have made it longer to allow the jack to sit upon the base. That would have put the balance triangle on the same base area. As it is now, the weight on the front wheel is the only thing that steadies the stand on the floor. More downward force from the jack would provide more stability for the front wheel.
Thanks for your comment. I do appreciate that you took the time to offer your thoughts. If I ever build another one, I will probably use your suggestion.
Ride safe,
Savage Greg
PS - I think that I will post an edited version of this discussion on the web site.