Eegore
Serious Thumper
Offline
SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 8010
|
"My example was in two movies I recently re-watched that had a flash forward at the end to portray where the characters ended up."
Yeah that's what I am pointing out as well, that you are not allowing the negative portrayal of a Democrat in any other way than specifically in the future, only "jokingly" and only at the end of a movie. Then on top of that they must be "Very" bad, or "Dumb".
That drastically reduces the availability of content, but it also excludes overall negative portrayals of Democrats, which I find very convenient. If a movie portrayed a present day elderly Democrat as a complete PoS, this wouldn't qualify under your parameters as an anti-Democrat portrayal in film.
"Are you going to argue or try to put up a defense that the entertainment culture is not left of center (or actually dramatically left of center)? Do you really believe you have a chance to make that case?"
No. Actually I have agreed with you multiple times.
"Your example is a poor one but let’s say I go ahead and give you a mercy point in your favor just for fun. You’re down 2-1. I can pull up 10 more on my side. Can you find 10 more on your side? The answer is no of course."
I can. Do you just want the titles or the breakdown of the character and how they are potentially negatively portrayed and how they are associated with the Democratic party? I would prefer your 10 have a breakdown of the character's role in the film and how they are associated with the Republican party. Or are you saying you can find 10 more movies that specifically portray a character in their future, jokingly, at the end of a film, that is very bad, or dumb?
"Conservative ideology doesn’t fit in with Hollywood and it certainly doesn’t make it to the top where decisions like that are made. That’s obvious. You can’t argue against that."
Yeah, I agreed with you on that multiple times already.
"You can make the argument that it doesn’t matter which I would refute but you can’t argue that the infrastructure is in place for movies that attack political parties to attack the Republican Party 99% of the time."
I don't think it is 99% of the time.
We would have to come to an agreement on how to define "attack" in film portrayals and infrastructure then choose a timeframe to assess every film made in the US during that timeframe. I propose the past 3 years to get started, then refine the process for another 7 years, then push for decade by decade after that.
|