Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Birthright citizenship goes to SCOTUS review (Read 29 times)
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9865

Birthright citizenship goes to SCOTUS review
Yesterday at 12:38:43
 

 Birthright citizenship goes to SCOTUS review.  Official information could be posted on Monday and the assessment will begin in the spring.

 Maybe the "under the jurisdiction" nonsense will actually get some backing from a real US Court for a change.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
thumperclone
Serious Thumper
Alliance Member
*****
Online

PGR rider  riding
with respect

Posts: 7261
Grand Junction Colorado
Gender: male
Re: Birthright citizenship goes to SCOTUS review
Reply #1 - Yesterday at 13:56:17
 
we are all birthright citizens children of immigrants at one time or another
Back to top
 
 

standing for those who stood for US
















  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9865

Re: Birthright citizenship goes to SCOTUS review
Reply #2 - Yesterday at 14:25:53
 

we are all birthright citizens children of immigrants at one time or another

 Doesn't matter.

 This applies now and for future humans in the US.  Using your logic there are no US Citizens, or a United States because there was a time when the US did not exist.   We are also all lungfish because there was a time before humans.

Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Needles
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 1109
AR
Gender: male
Re: Birthright citizenship goes to SCOTUS review
Reply #3 - Yesterday at 14:39:41
 
Why is it necessary to "review" something that is made clear in no uncertain terms in the original Constitution? It's just another MAGAT plot to strip citizenship from non-white people,




Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Serowbot
YaBB Moderator
ModSquad
*****
Offline

OK.... so what's the
speed of dark?

Posts: 29662
Tucson Az
Gender: male
Re: Birthright citizenship goes to SCOTUS review
Reply #4 - Yesterday at 15:05:26
 
The Constitution only applies to the 2nd Amendment
Didn't you know that?  Huh

Needles wrote on Yesterday at 14:39:41:
Why is it necessary to "review" something that is made clear in no uncertain terms in the original Constitution? It's just another MAGAT plot to strip citizenship from non-white people,




Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry

Back to top
 
 

Ludicrous Speed !... ... Huh...
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 9865

Re: Birthright citizenship goes to SCOTUS review
Reply #5 - Yesterday at 16:13:51
 
Why is it necessary to "review" something that is made clear in no uncertain terms in the original Constitution? It's just another MAGAT plot to strip citizenship from non-white people,

 I'm sure plenty of men said something like this before Aug 26, 1920 when they didn't want women to vote.

 No part of the US Constitution should be exempt from potential change.

 The Amendment process for the Constitution are there for this reason.  Things are going to change over time and the US legal system needs to change with it.  If the birthright citizenship process is being abused in a capacity that is detrimental to the overall good of the People, then it should be amended.  If it is not detrimental then things should continue as they are now.

 SCOTUS review is going to be part of that process, pass or fail.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 14418

Gender: male
Re: Birthright citizenship goes to SCOTUS review
Reply #6 - Today at 04:04:57
 
Of course you have no automatic right to full US Citizenship if your birth mother gave birth on US soil while she herself was not a US citizen.

Seems pretty simple.

The only reason you liberals are twisting yourselves into pretzels is because one: you see an opportunity for future voters and two:politics is a game and the blue jersey team is on one side and the red on the other.


“The United States and Canada are the only two developed/high-income countries with completely unrestricted birthright citizenship as of 2025. Most European, Asian, and Oceanian countries have abolished or heavily restricted it.”
Countries That Recently Restricted or Abolished Birthright Citizenship
•  Ireland (abolished in 2004)
•  New Zealand (2006)
•  Australia (1986, with restrictions since)
•  United Kingdom (1983)
•  India (1987, tightened 2004)
•  France (1993, now requires additional conditions)
•  Dominican Republic (2010, retroactively for Haitian descendants)
Countries With Conditional/Restricted Jus Soli
Examples of common restrictions:
•  At least one parent must be a citizen or legal permanent resident (e.g., most of Europe, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia).
•  Child must apply or register later (e.g., Portugal, Spain, Germany for certain cases).
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 14418

Gender: male
Re: Birthright citizenship goes to SCOTUS review
Reply #7 - Today at 04:15:45
 
Global Overview of Unrestricted Jus Soli

Unrestricted (or unconditional) birthright citizenship—where nearly anyone born on a country’s soil automatically becomes a citizen, regardless of parents’ status (with standard exceptions for diplomats or invading forces)—is practiced in approximately 30–35 countries out of about 195 sovereign nations worldwide.  

This makes it a minority policy globally, as the majority of countries (around 160) rely primarily on jus sanguinis (citizenship by descent/blood) or conditional versions of jus soli.  
Regional Breakdown
•  Western Hemisphere (Americas): This region overwhelmingly adopts unrestricted jus soli. Out of roughly 35 countries in the Americas, about 30 have it, including major ones like the United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, and most of Central and South America (e.g., Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Venezuela, and Caribbean nations like Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago).    This stems from historical influences, such as post-colonial constitutions modeled after the U.S. 14th Amendment or similar principles in Latin American independence movements.

•  Europe: No country offers unrestricted jus soli. Most (e.g., Germany, France, UK, Italy) use jus sanguinis or require conditions like parental residency or later application by the child.   Several, like Ireland (2004) and the UK (1983), abolished unrestricted versions in recent decades due to immigration concerns.

•  Asia: Only Pakistan has (or had) unrestricted jus soli, but it passed restrictions in late 2024 requiring parental citizenship/residency or 10 years of child residency; implementation is ongoing but effectively ends the unrestricted policy in practice.  Other Asian countries (e.g., China, India, Japan, South Korea) use jus sanguinis exclusively or with strict conditions.

•  Africa: Only Chad and Lesotho are sometimes listed, but with nuances (e.g., Chad requires a choice at age 18). 

•  Oceania: Fiji and Tuvalu are occasionally cited, but no major countries like Australia or New Zealand (both restricted it in the 1980s–2000s). 
In numerical terms: The Americas account for about 85–90% of countries with unrestricted jus soli, while Europe (0 out of ~50 countries) and Asia (effectively 0 out of ~50 as of late 2025) have none.   

This distribution is why sources describe the policy as “predominantly” or “the norm” in the Western Hemisphere, while it’s rare or absent elsewhere—making regions like Europe and Asia statistical outliers in not adopting it. 
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 14418

Gender: male
Re: Birthright citizenship goes to SCOTUS review
Reply #8 - Today at 04:23:34
 
Needles wrote on Yesterday at 14:39:41:
Why is it necessary to "review" something that is made clear in no uncertain terms in the original Constitution? It's just another MAGAT plot to strip citizenship from non-white people,

Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry



“Made clear in no uncertain terms in the original Constitution? “

What exactly did the original Constitution say about citizenship? Not any amendment, but in your phrase, the original Constitution?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Needles
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 1109
AR
Gender: male
Re: Birthright citizenship goes to SCOTUS review
Reply #9 - Today at 07:30:41
 
If you're born here, you are a US citizen.
If you're not born here, but immigrate, and pass the citizenship exam, you're a US citizen.

Not much wiggle room there, is it?



Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
12/06/25 at 09:45:39



General CategoryPolitics, Religion (Tall Table) › Birthright citizenship goes to SCOTUS review


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.