Global Media? Just Exactly why would America need that?
I'm guessing it's kinda like how we Need the gender fluid stuff in Peru..

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgj0gYcybdRo9cHaKlS...


Ohh,and $400,000.00 to,, ohh,I'm sure it's debunked..
You know, like when everyone said FJB had lost his marbles and it was really just a right wing conspiracy and some fancy video work.

You people are never wrong, are you?

[quote author=796578607D687F6E616263680D0 link=1739878550/0#1 date=1739879185]JOG wrote on 02/18/25 at 03:35:50:



Ohh,AMERICA needs to create a GLOBAL NETWORK to protect us,here,
Duude, you're an idiot.
Please, excuse me,, I forgot to point out
Our GOVERNMENT has exactly ZERO BUSINESS creating or supporting Any media outlets.
Those are things that May Confuse the commies. We call them
Private Enterprise.

That explains 400k to Gallup?

I'll let someone else explain it to you.

No. Because you're unable to hear anything I say.

MnSpring wrote on 02/18/25 at 06:22:24:

as opposed to    TRUMP
Sieg Heil
MAGA

Ohh,AMERICA needs to create a GLOBAL NETWORK to protect us,here,
Duude, you're an idiot.

 It's called propaganda, which there should be zero debate as the whether that works.  There's a ton of data and intelligence collected by means of "Global Media".  Remember those exploding pagers?  Structured and acceptance structure provided by GMNUS intel.  When we posted Billy Idol faces in Iraq over posters of Saddam to track infiltrate and destroy IED shops, - GMNUS intel.  

 Global Media Network funding should be audited, some of it is waste for sure, but to discount it entirely is ridiculous.

 Of course someone sitting at home that has never used any of it, seen or used it overseas, or can access the intel obviously knows more.  Kind of like a guy that reads about oil fields from one Political Ideology internet websites and social media knows more about oil fields than the guys that worked there right?

 That guy wouldn't be biasedly informed right?

Don't have to be experts.
to know that when money is given to studies like,
' two pecker billy goats,'
Is is just lining someone pockets.


 That would be true if it were a study, and was about two pecker billy goats.  But if it is about genetic mutation studies to treat diseases in humans, then the couch expert would have decided how useless it is without bothering to look or educate themselves because they don't need to.  

 The issue is the willingness to just discount anything that is titled in a way someone doesn't agree with.  Global propaganda is extremely useful, but as a couch expert is seems one already decided that the GMNUS is private media funding in exclusivity.  Even more ridiculous is years of claiming private media is influenced by government then all the sudden arguing as if a global media program would not be.

 This really is no different than you thinking internet neutrality was free internet.  Don't need to be an expert to know free internet should not be funded by the Government, but also not at all what it really is.  

Don't recall me saying that.
Could it possibly be that you,
just made it up !!!!!!!!!!!  


 I definitely dumbed it down but basically your initial responses were about access and control and not what NN was about.  


I guess you don't realize the reference to, 'Two Pecker Billy Goats', was a reference to most of the DFI 'give away' money of Tax Payers.
For absolutely stupid things, which will NEVER be of any value, except for the, 'KICK BACK' !

 I guess you don't realize the reference to looking at the name of some program and deciding everything it is about without bothering to look.  JOG decided a program isn't beneficial to national security based off an uneducated assessment of what it is, presumably based off the name.

 All I am saying is that one program has been used for national security, simply because propaganda is effective.

 A ton of the Government programs need to go, especially the KICK BACK ones.  I assume one's Kicking back to Starlink or Tesla probably aren't being addressed.