The audio analysis, if it's not been dikkt with, proves a second gunman was firing. Then a third,one shot report,, at the end,that took crooks out.

 There is further questioning in regard to measuring from Trump's nose to point at a shooter:

What are the exact internal dimensions of the strike zone in baseball? We can field test this but we need the dimensions of that target size. A line trajectory analysis can't be done from the tip of anything so will boring a hole through the head from the anterior centerline protrusion of the Pronasalae between the Supratrip Breakpoint medial line to the Supratrip Lubule and the Culumella. Bore line direct to ventral Neuhal Ridge.


 So yet another analysis saying basic math won't allow one to draw a line to an unknown location using one point of reference but what do we know?

 However an initial field test will give us information as long as the team can get the strike zone dimensions.  After this I will have 6 additional tests done from 6 teams that do not know each other, 3 will be given specifics about what this is in reference to and 3 will be done overseas with only dimensions given and no information stating it relates to Trump or any ballistics.  Those will be presented as a simple laser survey line analysis.

There are significantly LESS people that know what the above means.

You chose to simply use the description sent to you, and made no effort to explainin what; Pronasalae, Supratrip,  Lubule, Culumella, Neuhal, mean.


 The question is: What are the dimensions of a baseball strike zone?

  If you need clarity as to how a hole will be drilled into a mannequin head I can have it provided, if you think knowing more about the hole will help figure out the dimensions of a baseball strike zone as interpreted in this thread.



6 tests,  3 knowing details, 3 not knowing details,  and in two different Nations ?
(A Prostitute and Statistics. Once you lay down Statistics, you can do anything you want to do)

 Great.  I won't accept a single test since I can not create an average with one test.  I want 6, the evaluating crew wants 6.  We will do 6, and no prostitutes will be needed.



If one wants Credibility
9 would be better,
Each one of each 3.
1 - in the 10% center, 1 - a Trump supporter, 1 - a Harris supporter.

 That's plausible however it ignores blind input where the testing is done by humans that have zero knowledge of what it represents.  So 12 would be even better.  



Then, one set of the above 3.
(All in the Country that results would be meaningful in)

One set in a ’neutral’ State. 1, in the country. 1, in a 20-40 Thousand population.  1 in 100 thousand + city.
One in a Red State.  1, in the country. 1, in a 20-40 Thousand population.  1 in 100 thousand + city.
One in a Blue State.  1, in the country. 1, in a 20-40 Thousand population. 1 in 100 thousand + city.

Above would be bare bones.

 What does population volume impact the testing of laser movement at range specific to this exact test?  Why would the testing need to be done within those city limits, versus using humans from populations of those volumes outside the city limit?



One could add, color of skin, living conditions, heritage, religion,  language, income level,  and on and on.

 One could but how does religion impact the evaluation of laser movement at range?


 This appears to be nothing more than a poor attempt to ridicule the use of testing teams outside of the US.  The only reason external testing is done is to ensure blind input is entered into the overall evaluation - a requirement to retrieve more accurate information.

Those 3, do they hate or love; Kamala/Trump/Baseball/Left/Right/and on ........
It is well known that Large Cities are mostly Blue, and the smaller they get, more Red they are.


 What does an opinion on baseball have to do with measuring the travel of a laser?  Does a human that likes baseball measure distance different than a human that does not like baseball?  

 I see that population volume is to statistically influence each teams political affiliation.  Since statistics are equal to prostitution per your assessment then none of those volumes will be of value.  If they were, how can each team be considered to be of any political affiliation based off the location of the test alone?  Isn't it plausible that a team conducting the test in a "Red" town could have "Blue" humans running it?

 If a team conducts a test inside city limits, step 10 feet outside city limits and conducts the same test, should we expect different measurements?


Do you really think that WHO, was shot, would have absolutely no bearing ?

 It can, thus the reason for blind testing teams.


Another reason is: Things/Work, done overseas cost less money.

 This I not the case in this specific example and this example with the exemption of all other know examples of any kind.  There will be zero cost savings.  So to clarify:

The only reason external testing is done in this specific test and this test in exclusivity, only this test and not other known test is to ensure blind input is entered into the overall evaluation.

Another reason is the climate in a specific region can not be replicated in the US.  It does not apply here, but it is indeed another reason.  


Quick question, is, in this case, "...overseas..." the same as, "...external..." ?
Reference; "... and 3 will be done overseas ..."


 Yes.  My personal terminology for teams acting inside the scope of parameters I see as "external" will be called "external" and in this case all teams that have agreed to do this are across a large body of water.  Thus they, to me, are "overseas".