Thank you.

Used to be that when one BORROWED money, they paid it back.
 
 Unless it wasn't part of the agreement.  Conscripts as far back as Sumerian era Mesopotamia could have an agreement for debts to be forgiven as long as they worked the agreed time.



 Was it Biden who said:

"For it would be absurd that a soldier, at the moment perhaps when he was setting forth to fight for his fatherland, should be haled to prison by his creditor for an unpaid loan, and that the greed of private citizens should in this way endanger the safety of all."

 Oh wait that was Diodorus Siculus from 1st Century BC.

 Debt forgiveness was first documented in 2400 BCE by Enmetena of Lagash.

 It's in the Bible, Deuteronomy 15 v 9.

 Ptolemaic era Egypt used taxation to forgive debt.

 Loan forgiveness paid off by citizen taxation isn't new.  

 The claim that Biden "did it anyway" after a Supreme Court ruling is incorrect.  Also claiming it's Your Money in multiple cases is incorrect as the money is actually privately invested.

 I'm sure he will figure out a way to get as many loans paid off as he can and do it with US tax dollars.  He needs those votes.  However claiming they are all that way, and that government loan forgiveness was not common is incorrect.

 

So you believe that, because the ‘Forgiveness of a loan’ occurred thousands of years ago, it should still be practiced today?
Do you also believe that the many other, ‘common’, practices used then, should still be used today ?


 I said nothing like that.  That is just an over-reaction to my assessment that government loan forgiveness is historically present in human civilization.  Like if I say 8 Million kids didn't die in 2021 you say that I agreed with the CDC counts.  I never said that either.

 If we use my words one can assess I said the idea that government loan forgiveness is some new idea is wrong.  The whole "it used to be" that people paid back loans in full, must pre-date recorded history because a lot of evidence says otherwise.




‘Used to be in the last 100+ years, when one BORROWED money, in the USA, they paid it back.’

 This would also be wrong.  You could get government loan forgiveness as early as 1779.  The idea that human US citizens did not have the option to work-off or negotiate a pay-off (forgiveness) is wrong.




He is working very hard to do just that, as the previous posts outlined.

 I agree.  I also said that.  You seem to not Observe that.  My post is in relation to the lie that Biden "did it anyway" in regard to a Supreme Court ruling.  That's a lie.  What you will hear instead is "I agree with loan forgiveness in all forms using US tax dollars, Biden is God"  

 Everyone else it seems will just acknowledge what I actually said.




That does Not Negate, that YOUR Tax dollars are being used to PAY, someone else’s, Failures to pay.
     (And you know exactly how that works)

 I believe I know more about how it works than you do as I can at least acknowledge that some are not using US tax dollars.  Of course it is for votes, I said that multiple times, you will not Observe that.  I also said loans without previous agreement should not be part of tax-funded dilution.  You will not Observe that, instead you will claim I think loan forgiveness should happen.

 Previously agreed upon loan forgiveness should however be honored.  "It used to be" is not an argument to defend screwing over people that fulfilled their agreements.  They "managed their affairs" per the requirements and the Government just said "oops, my bad, keep paying".  

Oh Golly Gee,

  I could have had a V8 !!!!!!!

Instead of repaying Loans.

(Especially the ones I made under the Carter 'Regime' !)


 That example is again freely mixing humans with no agreement for loan forgiveness with those that did.  Do you really think people can't tell the difference between a pre-arranged agreement and a human defaulting on a loan?

 Humans with pre-loan agreements should not be screwed over by their government and then compared equally to humans that did not have agreements and told they should have "managed their affairs".  Your example is nothing more than saying you should have committed a crime because other humans had legal agreements different than yours.

 Mixing people with pre-agreed upon criteria and those that did not makes no sense.  The phrase "it used to be" is not a valuable argument for humans that have legally binding agreements for loan forgiveness.

I could have had a V8 !!!!!!!

Instead of repaying Loans.


 That's different than humans that PAID their loans for the time required.  It is literally the exact opposite behavior.

 Mixing the two makes no sense.  The phrase "it used to be" is not a valuable argument for humans that have legally binding agreements for loan forgiveness.

Eegore wrote on 12/16/23 at 21:11:42:

Just like people were forced to take a experimental vaccine, when they did not have to.

Just like the CDC/WHO inflating numbers of deaths.

Just like the higher death rate occurred for those that took the vaccines.

Just like Doctors and Nurses,
       who told the truth,
of what they were seeing,
         were censored.

        OK, Got it !

There is an advantage to free education.

Graduates do not have to leave anything in return and will therefore be less likely to work for companies that only have money as their goal and be prepared to pay a lot and steal our most intelligent people in that way.

This brings a lot of talent to places that serve society and science.
It is a sustainable way to invest in society as a whole.