The circumstances behind mine and my wife’s birth were such that had they occurred two decades later, we would likely have found ourselves chopped into little pieces, put into a plastic hazmat bag and tossed into the incinerator. But abortion was illegal and while wire coat hanger self-abortions occurred, much like the number of slaves lynched in the South or the number of witches killed in Salem, they weren’t as common as revisionist historians would have you believe.

We lived and us, our children and grandchildren have/will undoubtedly make a positive impact on the word.

The point is the article below where 32k additional children were born who otherwise would have been chopped, bagged and burned. Who knows the life one of those kids will go on to lead.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/willskipworth/2023/11/22/about-32000-more-babies...

I have a lot of respect for someone with a difficult start in life who goes far.


I would like to add something to the arbortion issue, namely that on the other side of the coin, people are helped to leave their lives by anesthesia, consciousness-altering substances and assistance in dying.

I think if you are against arbortion then you should not make use of these options. Anyone who argues for the worst should also accept the worst.

And then I would like to see how people who are against arbortion maintain their opinions when the end approaches.

I am primarily an advocate of self-determination. And I want women who can make that choice to be able to do so.

And to those people who are against arbortion I say: Get your thingy out of there ass.

“… people are helped to leave their lives by anesthesia, consciousness-altering substances and assistance in dying. …”

      Rather frowned upon in the US.

Yet the pro Abortion for, ANY /REASON, people.
SCREAM choice, Choice, CHOICE !
And are the same people that said you get,
         NO CHOICE,
when it comes to an experimental Vaccine.

Serowbot wrote on 11/25/23 at 06:08:22:


Apples vs oranges.
In one case, the child is killed which is a pretty big difference….

Another thought on immigration. We hear these are just honest, hard working people trying to provide for their families. What percentage of those immigrants fit that description is up for debate, but regardless, are we facilitating the decline of the home country they’re leaving? In other words, are we taking some of the best  people who could stay and help right the ship on their own countries problems?

Corruption is rampant in Latin and South America but where’s the focus to reduce that as opposed to allowing honest people an escape? This is not the 18 and 1900s. We don’t need immigrants like we did then. We have plenty of people to keep this country running and prosperous.

And we just allowed 32,000 to live because of a simple change in the law. Of course we killed millions and millions since 1973 and we were replaced them with immigrants. (And in some cases, pets)

Eegore wrote on 11/26/23 at 21:08:18:


The point is,
The SAME people who yell and scream that one should have the right to KILL, 95% (+/-)  of innocent humans, (Just For Convenience)  Then SAID YOU MUST get the shot, if you don’t, you are KILLING innocent people.
And if you don’t
You are a …, …, …, …,

"... It's a sh!tty one, but there's a choice ..."

What is sh1tty about, just saying NO ?

One cannot be FORCED to take an experimental vaccine.
Just as a person cannot be forced to KILL a Baby.

Thinking about a person signing a contract, keeping a copy of that contract,  then have the brains and fortitude to hold a person/company responsible to  honor the terms of that contract.

And what law is it that forced you to get the vaccine?
Oh right,... you didn't get the vaccine.
It was your choice not to.

And what law is it that forces women to get abortions?
Oh right,... there isn't one.
Just the law that forces them not to.

Serowbot wrote on 11/27/23 at 08:00:35:


Ask the people who lost their jobs because they refused to get the vaccine if they were forced or not.

And your analogy doesn’t apply with abortions, because there are two human lives involved, not one.