Eegore wrote on 09/01/23 at 20:32:34:
.

Have Already Answered them both.  

"...  What lumen chart are You using to measure intensity? ..."

You already know this.

For the people switching from Incandescent light bulbs to LED's, who need a simple formula.
Lumens or LM (the amount of light emitted from the bulb)

Many Poor Quality LED's will say, 'Equivalent to a 60 Watt bulb'.  then say 780LM or 800LM.  Where, generally 820 LM is a sort of standard.

What makes it so hard is LM's are a measure of light output. and Watts are a measurement of Power used.

LED bulbs when stating their LM's, also, (sometimes) state the Watts to get that LM.

A 800 LM Bulb, using 10-12 Watts is good,  Some are made to use as low as 8 Watts, some are still around that use 19 Watts. 800-820 LM, is close to the average 60 Watt Bulb.
 (Which used to be marked, in three ranges)

The forgotten and not well known is Kelvin degrees.
AKA 'K'.  That is the color of the light.
GENERALLY
2000-2500 = Candlelight. (Orange/Yellow)
2600 - 2800 =   Warm White. (yellowish)
2900 -3100 = Soft White. (White very little yellow
3200 - 3600 = Natural White. (White)
3700 - 4000 = Bright White.   (Very 'White')
4100 - 4500 = Very Bright White  (Sightly Blue)
4600 - 5000 = Bright Sunlight   (More Blueish)

Here is from a chart for, 'about's'.

   Less than 2000K: gives off a dim glow of light, similar to what you might find from candlelight; best for low-light areas where ambient illumination is welcomed.
   2000K-3000K: gives off a soft white glow, often yellow in appearance; best for living rooms, dining rooms, bedrooms and outdoor spaces.
   3100K-4500K: gives off a bright amount of white light; best for kitchens, offices, work spaces and vanities where task lighting is needed.
   4600K-6500K: gives off a bright amount of blue-white light, similar to that of daylight; best for display areas and work environments where very bright illumination is needed.
   6500K and up: gives off a bright bluish hue of light, often found in commercial locations; best for task lighting.

Eegore wrote on 09/01/23 at 21:24:09:

Nop, you do the work.

"... I can however find a multitude of charts that you may or may not be using ...   Until now you refused to answer this.

I did, you just don't understand it.

You know of  multitude charts.
 You tell all of us,
which one is correct !

Eegore wrote on 09/01/23 at 22:04:57:


Asking Bot about JFK boinking MM, and Teddy driving over a bridge drunk.
Is real Simple.
98.74% of the people that are familiar with both situations,
will say yes to both.

Bot will not say anything about both, BECAUSE,
the OFFICIAL Narrative is,
JFK was ’not’ boinking MM,
and Teddy was ’Not’ drunk driving over the bridge.

Saying he believes in what 98.74% of people that can read the reports.
Will say he believes in, ‘Conspiracy Theories’

Need more info just look up variants of:
‘Ted Kennedy - Mary Jo Kopechne”
“John Kennedy - Marilyn Monroe”

Wonder if Clinton got the idea of ‘Arkinside’ from,
“…she had been threatening to hold a press conference divulging her relationships with them…”

So I keep asking the questions,
Knowing
Bot will never answer !

The 2 questions you have asked me,
        I have answered,
You just don’t like or understand the answer.

Eegore wrote on 09/02/23 at 10:14:19:



I've been Watching this goofy show and not knowing where the so called Question that you've been obsessed with forcing Him to explain what is The Most Obvious Thing.

Such a pedantic child.

I don't know of any adult who actually Can read who would parse that down to any insinuation that it is somehow legally or physically impossible for someone to propose a change that would make owning, carrying, using guns easier for the People.
Maybehhas been upward and positive, therefore Your attitude is Wrong.  you understand that,  show your intellectual roadblock of a problem to Your Team. See if They can help. Hopefully someone will suggest to consider the general trajectory of the laws in favor versus the further diminishing of our rights, whether or not it's a Perceived lessening of those rights, the constant haranguing and open hostility by various members of the elected class. As a Defender of the Second Amendment I'm sure you have at your Immediate disposal sufficient evidence to Prove the actual trajectory of gun laws has

You can pretend that
Is your understanding
If that is true, it's not an indictment of his explanation. Only a liar could pretend what you are saying you Understand.