I flew on a plane last week with a guy from AZ and we talked briefly about the election audits.

 He is supportive of another recount.  I asked him what evidence he is willing to accept since the past recounts are inaccurate, and he said "whatever it takes".

 This of course isn't really answering the question, so I asked if there was a maximum number of recounts he thinks tax dollars should go to and he said no.  Basically he said any recount that shows Biden winning has to be wrong and needs to be recounted or investigated.  Do them until Trump wins.

 This was interesting as most the people I know from AZ are over it and just want to move on.

"Yes it is ‘interesting’,
as a person, in the vast majority of cases, usually ‘knows’, people
that are of like or same interests."

 Agreed.  I learned years ago to stop doing this as it is more beneficial for me to engage outside of an interest vacuum.  I've brought this up a few times here as it is the primary reason I communicate on this forum.

 I "know" 21 people, who I interact with regularly, regularly to me meaning 4 times or more per 30 days for a period of 4 hours or more each time, that currently reside, and have in AZ for a period of 364 days or more each.  I know them, their names, jobs, families etc. of these people most are just uninterested in the election audits at this time.

 

"Recounting fraudulent ballots won't change anything.
Mail in ballots without creases is kinda stupid."


 Except there weren't any, but who cares about verifying information we want to be true?

I did read that some ballots are damaged in the post and when this occurs a photocopy is made so that the ballot can be read by the vote counting machines.
This makes sense, and is not cheating.

Just another account of false evidence.
They are as likely to be Trump votes as Biden votes.