A look back in my posts will show I said he was murdered,,
After more information came out
I said he wasnt handled right,,

Now it looks like its just sad the cops even got there before the fukin thug died
because
drugs

Eegore wrote on 08/16/20 at 15:39:35:

Not directly, yet sure inferred !
By saying these words.

...Why do people need to keep drumming up lies...
...clearly is misrepresenting...
...an example of inaccuracy...
...So instead lies like this...
...You are using lies as backing...
...What part of using lies makes your argument...
...if you don't lie to them?...
     

Eegore wrote on 08/16/20 at 12:37:09:


The point is we treat black Americans like spoiled children that we’d rather promise an ice creme to than invest the time so they can function on their own. It’s easier to pretend Floyd was flat out murdered than to place some of the blame on him. And we’d rather not have cities burn if that were a black 5 year old so we pretend nothing happened.

A few blacks escape the not always so invisible plantation Democrats created for black Americans and good for them. Here’s one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMWee5bZ-Ak

His argument is to ignore the incorrect portions of his material.

First
I didnt kNOW it wasnt correct,,
How was I gonna?
How did you check it?
Why would I bother to see if every detail was supported elsewhere?
He DID in fact hold a gun on a woman .. So,, Yeah,, Its not a big deal she wasnt pregnant,.Hes STILL a complete TURD of a man..
What is it that makes your
Ohh, He wasnt so bad
info right?
How differently should I see that POS Floyd, knowing she wasnt pregnant?
Not all incorrect statements have the same bearing on the Grand Total of the information, so your assertion that I said Screwitt, ( Correct you were, because at the end of the day, he was a total POS who the world is better off without)
But
Nuance

Too bad the cops got there before he died,,

"First
I didnt kNOW it wasnt correct,,
How was I gonna?
How did you check it?"


 I got on Google and typed "Did George Floyd point a gun at a pregnant woman?  The first few links showed the actual case material.  Took about 5 minutes.


"Why would I bother to see if every detail was supported elsewhere?"

 Because the internet is full of lies, even the portions you agree with.  Like tons and tons of lies.  A tremendous amount of misleading information exists, so much its on the mainstream media almost daily.  Trump mentions it constantly.

 I have brought it up in multiple posts you have made.  We have had this exact conversation multiple times.  



"He DID in fact hold a gun on a woman .. So,, Yeah,, Its not a big deal she wasnt pregnant,.Hes STILL a complete TURD of a man.."

 I agree.  I still do not see any reason for anyone to add in misleading information and expect me to pretend they are being truthful.  Give me accurate information - not an explanation to ignore the false information.



"What is it that makes your
Ohh, He wasnt so bad
info right?"

 I never said that.  What is "right" is that he did not point a gun at a pregnant woman.  Why is the appropriate response here to tell me to ignore the wrong parts and just look at the right parts?  Would you accept that from me?



"How differently should I see that POS Floyd, knowing she wasnt pregnant?"

 I don't care how you see Floyd.  I agree with you.  What I do care about is being given misleading information and being told to ignore that part.  Then in another post your parameters are "Try using factual arguments"

http://suzukisavage.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1597784334

 The most fair way to handle that is to ask people to provide information and then inform you exactly what inaccurate portions of their argument you should ignore.

 That's what you did here, just let us do it too.